Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow Forum arrow Generalarrow Small Talkarrow A new Earth?

November 23, 2008, 03:31:55 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Overview   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: A new Earth?  (Read 4453 times)
RedShirt
Per Philosophia, Clarus. Per Clarus, Veritas.

Offline Offline

Posts: 2752


En Veritas, Voluntas.


« Reply #15 on: April 26, 2007, 07:34:00 PM »

Not to mention the impracticality of colonizing a planet 20 light years away...
Logged

"Freedom of speech is an American concept, so i don't give it any value."
~ Dean Stacey, investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

He heard the case against journalist Mark Steyn.  Steyn was accused of offending Muslims.
The Old Man

Offline Offline

Posts: 676


Half away. X)


« Reply #16 on: April 26, 2007, 08:38:21 PM »

Perhaps the existence of this planet will make scientists work harder on possible solutions for high-speed space travel. Now there's at least a place where we could want to go to.  cool
Logged

ewm90
Good old dyslexic
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5489



WWW
« Reply #17 on: April 26, 2007, 10:16:10 PM »

Nope Nasa has ben order by Press Bush to spind most of its munny on going back to the moon in sted of reashering space fisics and new ways to keep humans in spase for longer and longer times with out  letting thare bodys tern in  to jello. 
Logged

Landmark Education: Seminars, Courses & Landmark Forum

         - ----------------------------- I voted for ------------------------------ -

RedShirt
Per Philosophia, Clarus. Per Clarus, Veritas.

Offline Offline

Posts: 2752


En Veritas, Voluntas.


« Reply #18 on: April 26, 2007, 10:37:37 PM »

Not that that's a bad decision, though.  The moon doesn't deserve to be neglected, and it is much more practical.

Heck, you can't say it goes against "Trek" ideals of far-reaching stellar travel, either.

After all, the moon is heavily colonized in Star Trek...
Logged

"Freedom of speech is an American concept, so i don't give it any value."
~ Dean Stacey, investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

He heard the case against journalist Mark Steyn.  Steyn was accused of offending Muslims.
ewm90
Good old dyslexic
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5489



WWW
« Reply #19 on: April 26, 2007, 11:06:53 PM »

Yeh but we cut funding to the hubal telisope and funding from alot of other worth olits thay should not have. I mean we have the international spase station we dont need to refulling stations that close to each other.

Well all so cut funding from sinding manned spase shuttals up wish is much more inportent to seeing how people can safly live in space for long times.
Logged

Landmark Education: Seminars, Courses & Landmark Forum

         - ----------------------------- I voted for ------------------------------ -

RedShirt
Per Philosophia, Clarus. Per Clarus, Veritas.

Offline Offline

Posts: 2752


En Veritas, Voluntas.


« Reply #20 on: April 26, 2007, 11:10:29 PM »

Actually, a space mission within the next few months is going to repair hubble.
Logged

"Freedom of speech is an American concept, so i don't give it any value."
~ Dean Stacey, investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

He heard the case against journalist Mark Steyn.  Steyn was accused of offending Muslims.
ewm90
Good old dyslexic
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5489



WWW
« Reply #21 on: April 26, 2007, 11:19:22 PM »

Waw I am inprested. The last I heird of the Hubild was bush saying hubales to exspisive and we need to junk it. Mabby this new congress have overterned that polasy 
Logged

Landmark Education: Seminars, Courses & Landmark Forum

         - ----------------------------- I voted for ------------------------------ -

Prowannabe
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 63



« Reply #22 on: April 26, 2007, 11:46:56 PM »

The Hubble is quite expensive, just think about fixing something over 100 miles above you; they need to prep a shuttle and get a team of experts to repair the Hubble and come back down and wait until it breaks again and now we can make digital telescopes many times better with better repair systems; i.e. backup systems, auxiliary systems, and repair software too actually tell you exactly whats wrong with it and it would  be smaller specially with MEMS technology; its still a little experimental though, but they use MEMS in the new mirror televisions.   
Logged
ewm90
Good old dyslexic
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5489



WWW
« Reply #23 on: April 27, 2007, 03:43:01 AM »

Well its cheaper than bilding a new one. The huble is still usefule it still can find new things.

Yes but if something works for what its need for way thow it away? The hubale has systoms that tell you when thares a problom and what it is and it has a serton amont of softwhare repar proticals.

Is that what the voses in yoe head told you? J/K
Logged

Landmark Education: Seminars, Courses & Landmark Forum

         - ----------------------------- I voted for ------------------------------ -

RedShirt
Per Philosophia, Clarus. Per Clarus, Veritas.

Offline Offline

Posts: 2752


En Veritas, Voluntas.


« Reply #24 on: April 27, 2007, 05:13:14 PM »

We are building a new one; the James Webb space telescope will be deployed in 2011.
Logged

"Freedom of speech is an American concept, so i don't give it any value."
~ Dean Stacey, investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

He heard the case against journalist Mark Steyn.  Steyn was accused of offending Muslims.
ewm90
Good old dyslexic
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5489



WWW
« Reply #25 on: April 27, 2007, 09:34:57 PM »

Space in a big place. you can have 100 telescope and still not see every thing the Hubble is still useful.
Logged

Landmark Education: Seminars, Courses & Landmark Forum

         - ----------------------------- I voted for ------------------------------ -

The Old Man

Offline Offline

Posts: 676


Half away. X)


« Reply #26 on: April 27, 2007, 09:44:11 PM »

Nope Nasa has ben order by Press Bush to spind most of its munny on going back to the moon in sted of reashering space fisics and new ways to keep humans in spase for longer and longer times with out  letting thare bodys tern in  to jello. 

Wasn't it Bush who talked about colonizing Mars until 2020? At least this was the last announcement (in which he also talked about going back to the Moon) of him I can remember. So how does it come they cut NASA's budget? I'm just asking.
Logged

ewm90
Good old dyslexic
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5489



WWW
« Reply #27 on: April 27, 2007, 10:26:31 PM »

Mars makes sens theirs anoff resoreses their to start a self sustainable habituate. after that speech the white house put out a announcements about these cuts.
Logged

Landmark Education: Seminars, Courses & Landmark Forum

         - ----------------------------- I voted for ------------------------------ -

RedShirt
Per Philosophia, Clarus. Per Clarus, Veritas.

Offline Offline

Posts: 2752


En Veritas, Voluntas.


« Reply #28 on: April 28, 2007, 12:30:52 AM »

Space in a big place. you can have 100 telescope and still not see every thing the Hubble is still useful.

Still useful, but it's not like the US govt can just call in repairmen to fix every little problem.  They have to launch an incredibly difficult and dangerous and expensive mission involving many spacewalks to fix it.

Besides, space is a harsh place.  Something can only operate up there for so long.
Logged

"Freedom of speech is an American concept, so i don't give it any value."
~ Dean Stacey, investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

He heard the case against journalist Mark Steyn.  Steyn was accused of offending Muslims.
Admiral Adama
have you done 127 in a jeep? thats right

Offline Offline

Posts: 1026



WWW
« Reply #29 on: April 28, 2007, 08:27:52 PM »

I hate to bust ewms buble but he talking out of his A**
1:Huble:  how do you know fixing its cheaper than building a new one?  Gimme a link.  Besides its not as if we are desperate for cash. I Think that building a new telescope and putting it in a rocket is cheaper(and safer)  then sending astronauts up to fix the telescope.
2:about the new planet: Has any one ever heard of a Generation ship?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_ship
the speed of light IS ALMOST attainable.  assuming we get close to it then it would only take 20 years In OUR TIME.  Relativity would assure that anyone embarking on this voyage would be much less than 20 years older when they arrivedhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity
3:Palosy it a *************************************************************er
Logged

Why battlestar galactica is better than star trek:

Can't do that in a Sov.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

© 2003-2008 DOCa Cola. All rights reserved.
Star Trek and related marks are trademarks of Paramount Pictures.
Powered by Joomla
Powered by SMF 1.1.6 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com