Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow Forum arrow Fleet Operationsarrow Feature Requestarrow Replacing Decent Class

October 13, 2008, 06:51:29 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Overview   Help Search Login Register  
Poll
Question: which one?
Prometheus:) - 22 (43.1%)
Galaxy3:) - 12 (23.5%)
Battlestar Galactica(lol)(note this is a joke) - 3 (5.9%)
I'm an idiot, I dont want it replaced!Sad - 7 (13.7%)
make a new one from scratch - 7 (13.7%)
Total Voters: 4

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9]
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: Replacing Decent Class  (Read 5937 times)
eoraptor

Offline Offline

Posts: 48



WWW
« Reply #120 on: January 04, 2007, 03:13:40 AM »

I think he's talking about the Galaxy Mrk III Listed in some novels and supposedly appearing at the end of the Dominion War... Basically a Galaxy with Intrepid and Soverign class tech like EMH, bio-nueral computers, etc...

and while you could debate till doomsday if the Super-Dreadnought Galaxy-X is cannon, It definitely doesn't belong in fleet ops  
Logged


I find your lack of punctuation.... disturbing.
Silver Gryphon

Offline Offline

Posts: 58



« Reply #121 on: January 04, 2007, 03:22:22 AM »

I gotta agree with eoraptor. the galaxy X was a cool hot rod that was a great frolic and lots of fun for one episode. they had a right to go out with a bang Wink  I think that they should replace the current descent model with a model reminiscent of the prommy. IE; arrowhead saucer, Keep the nacells excelsior 2 style though. And only 1 blasted drive section hull!!!! That thing is even more outlandish than the Gal-X with its twin defelctors (Talk about superfluous LOL (Its a fun model, just not a good regular timeline ship Wink ) After all its logical that one of starfleet's most powerful ships would be a spinoff of a battleship prototype Wink And it needs some sort of special ability. Wink
« Last Edit: January 04, 2007, 03:24:25 AM by Silver Gryphon » Logged

It pays not to turn your back on a Reman. It is unwise to turn your back on a Romulan. It is foolish to turn your back on a Jem Hadar. It is foolhardy to turn your back on a Noxter. And if you are any of the above evils; you don't even have to turn your back on a Gryphon, you're dead anyway.
eoraptor

Offline Offline

Posts: 48



WWW
« Reply #122 on: January 04, 2007, 03:58:03 AM »

Well, The Phobos Mesh has twin drive-hulls, and no one complains about it! Maybe it's an execution rather than a design thing.

 
Logged


I find your lack of punctuation.... disturbing.
RedShirt
Per Philosophia, Clarus. Per Clarus, Veritas.

Offline Offline

Posts: 2751


En Veritas, Voluntas.


« Reply #123 on: January 05, 2007, 01:38:34 AM »

Quote
I think he's talking about the Galaxy Mrk III Listed in some novels and supposedly appearing at the end of the Dominion War... Basically a Galaxy with Intrepid and Soverign class tech like EMH, bio-nueral computers, etc...

and while you could debate till doomsday if the Super-Dreadnought Galaxy-X is cannon, It definitely doesn't belong in fleet ops
lol, I think you give the Galaxy 3 too much credit.  LOL

It actually never appeared in any reliable source.  I only like it because it seems to be what a post-dominion war retrofit of the Galaxy would look like, with the more sovy-ish hull and soxy nacelles, and a sovy deflector dish as well.  It's just like the relation between the Constitution class and the refitted Constitution class (e.g. Ent-A).  Too bad I lost my pics of it.  Sad

Oh, btw do you have a pic of the Phobos anywhere?
Logged

"Freedom of speech is an American concept, so i don't give it any value."
~ Dean Stacey, investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

He heard the case against journalist Mark Steyn.  Steyn was accused of offending Muslims.
Silver Gryphon

Offline Offline

Posts: 58



« Reply #124 on: January 05, 2007, 04:19:20 AM »

Well then they should replace the galay model with a mark 3 model, alter the name and stats slightly and thatd help continuity
Logged

It pays not to turn your back on a Reman. It is unwise to turn your back on a Romulan. It is foolish to turn your back on a Jem Hadar. It is foolhardy to turn your back on a Noxter. And if you are any of the above evils; you don't even have to turn your back on a Gryphon, you're dead anyway.
eoraptor

Offline Offline

Posts: 48



WWW
« Reply #125 on: January 05, 2007, 09:05:01 PM »

Quote
RedShirt,Jan 5 2007, 01:38 AM] lol, I think you give the Galaxy 3 too much credit.  LOL

It actually never appeared in any reliable source.  I only like it because it seems to be what a post-dominion war retrofit of the Galaxy would look like, with the more sovy-ish hull and soxy nacelles, and a sovy deflector dish as well.  It's just like the relation between the Constitution class and the refitted Constitution class (e.g. Ent-A).  Too bad I lost my pics of it.  Sad

Oh, btw do you have a pic of the Phobos anywhere?
I'll have to dig for my renders... a lot seem to have disappeared... if not, I'll boot to XP and do up one right quick.

[edit] as promised
« Last Edit: January 05, 2007, 09:36:40 PM by eoraptor » Logged


I find your lack of punctuation.... disturbing.
RedShirt
Per Philosophia, Clarus. Per Clarus, Veritas.

Offline Offline

Posts: 2751


En Veritas, Voluntas.


« Reply #126 on: January 07, 2007, 03:48:48 AM »

I does have double hulls, BUT it's an stand-alone design and therefore could be made to use one centralized core WITHOUT haveing to do major logistical headaches from rerouting everything and making room for a new core, as would have to be the case with the Descent.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2007, 03:50:25 AM by [=!=]RedShirt » Logged

"Freedom of speech is an American concept, so i don't give it any value."
~ Dean Stacey, investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

He heard the case against journalist Mark Steyn.  Steyn was accused of offending Muslims.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9]
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

© 2003-2008 DOCa Cola. All rights reserved.
Star Trek and related marks are trademarks of Paramount Pictures.
Powered by Joomla
Powered by SMF 1.1.6 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com