Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow Forum arrow Fleet Operationsarrow Feature Requestarrow A Little More Trek Realism

December 05, 2008, 05:32:14 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Overview   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: A Little More Trek Realism  (Read 3283 times)
Silver Gryphon

Offline Offline

Posts: 58



« Reply #15 on: January 03, 2007, 03:00:20 AM »

The self destruct should be highly damaging, but only in a very small radius Wink  
Logged

It pays not to turn your back on a Reman. It is unwise to turn your back on a Romulan. It is foolish to turn your back on a Jem Hadar. It is foolhardy to turn your back on a Noxter. And if you are any of the above evils; you don't even have to turn your back on a Gryphon, you're dead anyway.
RedShirt
Per Philosophia, Clarus. Per Clarus, Veritas.

Offline Offline

Posts: 2752


En Veritas, Voluntas.


« Reply #16 on: January 03, 2007, 07:03:55 PM »

Agreed, but I REALLY dont want some online hotshot flying into my base with a ****load of sarbes and blowing up my whole frakking base, so I have to say ONLY THE BIG SHIPS GET THE BIG BOOM.
Logged

"Freedom of speech is an American concept, so i don't give it any value."
~ Dean Stacey, investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

He heard the case against journalist Mark Steyn.  Steyn was accused of offending Muslims.
Silver Gryphon

Offline Offline

Posts: 58



« Reply #17 on: January 03, 2007, 09:35:30 PM »

True, A Saber's self destruct should only be damaging in a miniscule radius and it should have about enough punch to disable a venture LOL  
Logged

It pays not to turn your back on a Reman. It is unwise to turn your back on a Romulan. It is foolish to turn your back on a Jem Hadar. It is foolhardy to turn your back on a Noxter. And if you are any of the above evils; you don't even have to turn your back on a Gryphon, you're dead anyway.
RedShirt
Per Philosophia, Clarus. Per Clarus, Veritas.

Offline Offline

Posts: 2752


En Veritas, Voluntas.


« Reply #18 on: January 03, 2007, 10:56:07 PM »

Also, there is the small matter that shockwakes don't carry in space...
Logged

"Freedom of speech is an American concept, so i don't give it any value."
~ Dean Stacey, investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

He heard the case against journalist Mark Steyn.  Steyn was accused of offending Muslims.
Silver Gryphon

Offline Offline

Posts: 58



« Reply #19 on: January 06, 2007, 10:32:14 PM »

Apparently Dominion HypSpace warhead shocks, Tri and quad cobalt torp shocks and such do now Tongue  
Logged

It pays not to turn your back on a Reman. It is unwise to turn your back on a Romulan. It is foolish to turn your back on a Jem Hadar. It is foolhardy to turn your back on a Noxter. And if you are any of the above evils; you don't even have to turn your back on a Gryphon, you're dead anyway.
RedShirt
Per Philosophia, Clarus. Per Clarus, Veritas.

Offline Offline

Posts: 2752


En Veritas, Voluntas.


« Reply #20 on: January 07, 2007, 04:01:49 AM »

Quote
Apparently Dominion HypSpace warhead shocks, Tri and quad cobalt torp shocks and such do now Tongue
It could be argued that they arn't true shokwaves, but waves of plasma/other energy forms...
« Last Edit: January 07, 2007, 04:02:00 AM by [=!=]RedShirt » Logged

"Freedom of speech is an American concept, so i don't give it any value."
~ Dean Stacey, investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

He heard the case against journalist Mark Steyn.  Steyn was accused of offending Muslims.
Atlantis

Offline Offline

Posts: 279



« Reply #21 on: January 07, 2007, 04:33:45 PM »

About the whole self destruct thing:

A ship with Self Destruct is not a "flying bomb". Self Destruct is used to prevent an enemy commandeering your ship. It's a defence, not a weapon.
Therefore that's pretty much all it should do: destroy the ship itself.
Logged

"I need to know if we did serious harm to this life form."
"Let's see. You ran your ship through it, fired phasers at it, and blew a hole in it with a photon torpedo. I'd say it's a pretty good chance..."
RedShirt
Per Philosophia, Clarus. Per Clarus, Veritas.

Offline Offline

Posts: 2752


En Veritas, Voluntas.


« Reply #22 on: January 07, 2007, 08:24:27 PM »

Quote
About the whole self destruct thing:

A ship with Self Destruct is not a "flying bomb". Self Destruct is used to prevent an enemy commandeering your ship. It's a defence, not a weapon.
Therefore that's pretty much all it should do: destroy the ship itself.
Very true.  I just don't know how we would prevent people from utilizing it as such should it be implemented.  Would it be possible for the button to appear only when one or more of several conditions apply?  

If it is, than the conditions I suggest would be:
1) The ship is being boarded
2) The ship's engines are inoperative
3) The ship is under 1/8 hull integrity.

Oh, and welcome back, Atlantis!  Cheesy
« Last Edit: January 07, 2007, 08:25:38 PM by [=!=]RedShirt » Logged

"Freedom of speech is an American concept, so i don't give it any value."
~ Dean Stacey, investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

He heard the case against journalist Mark Steyn.  Steyn was accused of offending Muslims.
Silver Gryphon

Offline Offline

Posts: 58



« Reply #23 on: January 07, 2007, 08:47:50 PM »

Nah! Id say have it all the time, just make it so that the sequence only damages the ship itself Wink  
Logged

It pays not to turn your back on a Reman. It is unwise to turn your back on a Romulan. It is foolish to turn your back on a Jem Hadar. It is foolhardy to turn your back on a Noxter. And if you are any of the above evils; you don't even have to turn your back on a Gryphon, you're dead anyway.
Frodo

Offline Offline

Posts: 726



« Reply #24 on: January 08, 2007, 03:51:25 PM »

that would prevent other races from stealing your ship without having to beat the hell out of it first! LOL Wink
Logged

RedShirt
Per Philosophia, Clarus. Per Clarus, Veritas.

Offline Offline

Posts: 2752


En Veritas, Voluntas.


« Reply #25 on: January 08, 2007, 04:48:57 PM »

Quote
Nah! Id say have it all the time, just make it so that the sequence only damages the ship itself Wink
that could work, but then it would render the borg holding beam useless, as any halfway decent player would just blow a caught ship up immedeatly...
Logged

"Freedom of speech is an American concept, so i don't give it any value."
~ Dean Stacey, investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

He heard the case against journalist Mark Steyn.  Steyn was accused of offending Muslims.
Silver Gryphon

Offline Offline

Posts: 58



« Reply #26 on: January 12, 2007, 08:42:53 PM »

Well since the SDS (self destruct sequence) is a special weapon (technically) then have the holding beam weaponclass bisable the SDS weapon.
Logged

It pays not to turn your back on a Reman. It is unwise to turn your back on a Romulan. It is foolish to turn your back on a Jem Hadar. It is foolhardy to turn your back on a Noxter. And if you are any of the above evils; you don't even have to turn your back on a Gryphon, you're dead anyway.
Jem Hadar

Offline Offline

Posts: 50



WWW
« Reply #27 on: January 13, 2007, 07:58:59 AM »

Just a quick idea, that came to my mind when i read this.

In another thread we are talking about "heroes" for every race, mabe the feds get picard and with him a anti borg specialist, with a kind of auto self destruct when boarded.
It destroyes itself when it has a very low crew NOT when its just hit by a holding beam.

AS i said, a quick idea, what do you think ?
Logged
Jan
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 739


Chefredakteur bei ST-Galaxy Network


« Reply #28 on: January 13, 2007, 05:54:52 PM »

Quote
Just a quick idea, that came to my mind when i read this.

In another thread we are talking about "heroes" for every race, mabe the feds get picard and with him a anti borg specialist, with a kind of auto self destruct when boarded.
It destroyes itself when it has a very low crew NOT when its just hit by a holding beam.

AS i said, a quick idea, what do you think ?
that's a fantastic idea!!!
Logged

Silver Gryphon

Offline Offline

Posts: 58



« Reply #29 on: January 13, 2007, 09:29:51 PM »

thats a fantastic idea!! Cheesy  No SD in a borg holding beam, unless you've got Jen Luc's special bonuses Cheesy  
Logged

It pays not to turn your back on a Reman. It is unwise to turn your back on a Romulan. It is foolish to turn your back on a Jem Hadar. It is foolhardy to turn your back on a Noxter. And if you are any of the above evils; you don't even have to turn your back on a Gryphon, you're dead anyway.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

© 2003-2008 DOCa Cola. All rights reserved.
Star Trek and related marks are trademarks of Paramount Pictures.
Powered by Joomla
Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com