TD]Roach pepal are resposube for thare own behaver if thay are not mucher a nuff to hold a debate thay should not be posting here
ewm you don't know what responsible means.
what you did with those pictures of children that accidently died by gun shots was manipulating someones emotions. ASK yourself why you didn't show fat lazy 50 years olds? that died by accidental gun shootings.
because if you show that nobody cared about them.
if you show something about innocent sweet children that where murdered by guns. People start to think about their own children. It hits emotionally harder then a fat lazy ******* that dies.
you can't tell me that if you start spreading word about so many innocent children dying by guns that you aren't trying to manipulate someone into having certain ideas about guns.
i can do the same thing about mexican immigrants in america. lets campain they should get out of the country. Now in what way you should be doing that? By stirring up peoples emotion very hard. How?
show that statisticly more mexicans are involved in killing then caucasians. do that aswell with other things like theft and drug dealing. Show mexicans that live of governmnet pay roll and show that that they are just lazy and steal honnest white mens jobs.
These are all half truths only showing a minorty of what mexican immigrants do in the US. But if you continuesly show that on tv. people will change their oppion about the subject. That is done in sects, in Neo nazi groeps, in klux klux clans even Hitler did the same thing with Jews.
and how was that so succesfull? it was all playing on peoples fear. the people assumed that if you hear about it constatly, it must have been true.
you can also do such campains about not sending food in sudan where hunger takes millions of lives. just show the minority of the people that are hunger stricken who steal from from aid services and that kind of things. and people start thinking differently. It spreads hate.
what you did was the opposite. you gave those children an angelic status of innocence and playing on the fear of parents that the threat of loosing their child is very high if not dealt with guns.
but back on that shooting case, shooting an unarmed person is an offence. can't help you there. shooting unarmed people even if he is a burglar is an offence. you are only allowed to give warnings. things change if the burglar also has a weapon.