more pepal die from guns that all uther intinchanal weponds combind x2.
Other intensional weapons?
People Stabbed to Death.
People Beaten to Death.
Chemical and Biological Warfare.
Mines and other explosivedevices.
Terrorist attacks (Which often do not involve guns).
I don't know, I'd say more people die from explosives and knives, than from guns.
And also on a side note.
The H&K G36C (CQB Carbine), K (Karabiner Shortened Barrel) and E (Export Rifle)
Are pretty cool guns, for their polymer construction, reliability and accuracy.
But those are merely for military purposes.
I see nothing wrong with someone owning a pistol, for self defence, sport, hunting, ect.
Its someones unique right to hunt, and to find sport with a firearm, and to defend themselves.
The only thing that bothers me, is when fully automatic concealable weapons (EG. H&K MP5K, Uzi (In most forms), Mac-10, Mp-7 ect) Can be aqquired in their original forms (Eg no pin stopping full auto, original caliber ect). That is not self defence, not everyone needs to tote around an AK-47/74/101 to defend themselves, all they need is a knife, a crowbar or a small pistol? Honestly, its not a horrible concept. And most people simply use them to deter a foe, rather then cap them in the *** with 6 bullets. And yes people die all the time, your country (As I am not American) has over 250 million people in it, so if 100 people die a year or even 1000, it is negligble as this is still a massive percentage of a safe public, even if one death is a tradgedy, you use these peoples deaths as statistics, when every country has violence, and this ability to own a personal defensive weapon has enabled your countries to go down.