Acidpunk
Formerly 4 of 11
Member
 Offline
Posts: 1199
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: December 22, 2005, 02:19:20 PM » |
|
yeah i dont debate what its called i just would like it instead of the decent
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Frodo
Member
Offline
Posts: 727
|
|
« Reply #16 on: December 22, 2005, 03:34:01 PM » |
|
indeed, if mvam isnt possible in FO would like to see the prommie looking titan in the game in place of descent
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Admiral Adama
have you done 127 in a jeep? thats right
Member
Offline
Posts: 1026
Topic starter
|
|
« Reply #17 on: December 22, 2005, 04:08:53 PM » |
|
I would rather have the actual prom
1:its cannon
2:the other one may look good but its a ripoff
3:we dont need MVAM just get the prom with out it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Why battlestar galactica is better than star trek:  Can't do that in a Sov. |
|
|
Acidpunk
Formerly 4 of 11
Member
Offline
Posts: 1199
|
|
« Reply #18 on: December 23, 2005, 01:25:28 AM » |
|
no offense but anyone who say the prom in a game would kill for Mvam otherwise u aint a trek fan
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
[TD]Roach
Member
Offline
Posts: 1138
|
|
« Reply #19 on: December 23, 2005, 08:32:37 AM » |
|
i don't like the prom with its mvam
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 THAT'S WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU PLAY FLEETOPS |
|
|
Admiral Adama
have you done 127 in a jeep? thats right
Member
Offline
Posts: 1026
Topic starter
|
|
« Reply #20 on: December 23, 2005, 03:59:01 PM » |
|
i realy dont want mvam because it just slows down the computer and the game and v4/5
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Why battlestar galactica is better than star trek: Can't do that in a Sov. |
|
|
Rhaz
Member
Offline
Posts: 531
|
|
« Reply #21 on: December 24, 2005, 12:23:17 AM » |
|
I think we just need some better sort of Warship.
If you notice the Warp In ships, they are all older designs.
The Steamrunner, Galaxy and Nebula.
All newer ships (I believe the Prometheus would be included here)
Are built at Ship Yards, rather then requisitioned and diverted from other duties.
I also find it weird how the Galaxy and Nebula have same crew requirements? <,<.
But thats off topic.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Everyone knows Decepticons can't ball!"  |
|
|
Acidpunk
Formerly 4 of 11
Member
Offline
Posts: 1199
|
|
« Reply #22 on: December 24, 2005, 12:15:34 PM » |
|
steam runners arent old designs :omg:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ColdDarkParanoia
Member
Offline
Posts: 443
|
|
« Reply #23 on: December 24, 2005, 02:33:17 PM » |
|
relitivly old i believe
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RedShirt
Per Philosophia, Clarus. Per Clarus, Veritas.
Member
Offline
Posts: 2749
En Veritas, Voluntas.
|
|
« Reply #24 on: December 24, 2005, 07:06:22 PM » |
|
steam runners arent old designs :omg: the prototype has a registry number in the '52s, placing the commisioning date as 2345. I don't like it either, but its accepted cannon. Also, one problem with the Ares design: its intended to be about 120 meters if I remember right. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 24, 2005, 07:07:20 PM by [=!=]RedShirt »
|
Logged
|
"Freedom of speech is an American concept, so i don't give it any value."
~ Dean Stacey, investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission.
He heard the case against journalist Mark Steyn. Steyn was accused of offending Muslims.
|
|
|
Cpt Ryan
Fleet Ops mob boss
Member
Offline
Posts: 1907
There is no spoon
|
|
« Reply #25 on: December 27, 2005, 10:36:28 PM » |
|
steam runners arent old designs :omg: i tend to believe that they were built just after Wolf 359, since you dont actually see any wreckage of them. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"The past makes us who we are... forget your past and you have no future"-Me.. i think
"better to send 5 lions than 500 sheep"- some guy i can't remember
"DANCE FOOL!!... and make it a nice dance"- another guy i cant remember
|
|
|
Acidpunk
Formerly 4 of 11
Member
Offline
Posts: 1199
|
|
« Reply #26 on: December 28, 2005, 12:27:43 AM » |
|
if you look at the design of the ship and the armour
it looks the same as the Defiant akira sov era so i dont think they are that old do you
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ColdDarkParanoia
Member
Offline
Posts: 443
|
|
« Reply #27 on: December 28, 2005, 12:12:11 PM » |
|
im sure they had somthing simmilar to it's in the TMP era. could be possible because in the enterprise era, you saw ships that had the begiinings of that disign.
although that dosn't actuarly count for anything as ent was shot after the lot of them
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 28, 2005, 12:14:25 PM by ColdDarkParanoia »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Acidpunk
Formerly 4 of 11
Member
Offline
Posts: 1199
|
|
« Reply #28 on: December 28, 2005, 03:30:45 PM » |
|
nope they didnt the Steamrunner is one of the most unique starship designs for the federation in a very long time if not ever
sure the defiant was original but it was based on a runabout the steamrunner however was a completely new design
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Admiral Adama
have you done 127 in a jeep? thats right
Member
Offline
Posts: 1026
Topic starter
|
|
« Reply #29 on: December 28, 2005, 03:51:36 PM » |
|
the steamrunner is nice but it looks a little flimsy. it has no hieght but looks very ood from top. i dont think it should be warp in because of what rhaz said. i do however think they should be included in a yard. after all the romulans have an equilalent
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Why battlestar galactica is better than star trek: Can't do that in a Sov. |
|
|
|
