Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow Forum arrow Generalarrow Star Trekarrow Star Trek Trivia!

January 10, 2009, 01:56:53 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Overview   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: Star Trek Trivia!  (Read 5845 times)
Admiral Adama
have you done 127 in a jeep? thats right

Offline Offline

Posts: 1026



WWW
« Reply #105 on: December 10, 2005, 02:01:40 AM »

ok first off she wasnt bajoran she was cardassian loing like bajoran.  second u need to read STAR TREK BADLANDS BOOK 1 & 2
Logged

Why battlestar galactica is better than star trek:

Can't do that in a Sov.
Acidpunk
Formerly 4 of 11

Offline Offline

Posts: 1199



« Reply #106 on: December 10, 2005, 05:04:13 AM »

what are you talking about???


in the episode tuvok had been exposed to mind control by a bajoran man while he was still in the alpha quadrant and was activated while on voyager

your talking about Seska

seriously read before you post
Logged

Casper
Commanding Officer, U.S.S. Griffin
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1428



« Reply #107 on: December 10, 2005, 11:23:35 AM »

home 1 wasn't a mc-90 (they didn't have em yet), and it doesn't look like a mc-80b (IMHO), so thats why i said MC-80a. the thing about the "early" mc cruisers is that they are makeshift warships, where as the ISDs and VSDs are designed for combat. but argue all you want.
Logged


Wind, Forrest, Fire, Mountain -Sun Tzu's "The Art of War"

"My candle burns at both ends- It will not last the night. but ah, my friends, and oh my foes it gives a lovely light." -Edna St. Vincent Millay
Admiral Adama
have you done 127 in a jeep? thats right

Offline Offline

Posts: 1026



WWW
« Reply #108 on: December 10, 2005, 05:09:10 PM »

oh oh! I have a question.  in DS9 finale.  what year bloodwine do they drink?
Logged

Why battlestar galactica is better than star trek:

Can't do that in a Sov.
Acidpunk
Formerly 4 of 11

Offline Offline

Posts: 1199



« Reply #109 on: December 10, 2005, 05:56:40 PM »

if memory serves 2309 there is no finer vintage
Logged

LordsofKobol

Offline Offline

Posts: 356



WWW
« Reply #110 on: December 10, 2005, 10:27:43 PM »

EDIT:!Eek :omg: I had the names mixed up Tongue Thanks to Rhaz for correcting me Tongue! As such, deleted large parts of the post Tongue I'm very sorry people...my mistake, all me...*hears someone turn on a lightsaber* ok...not my fault to that extream...

it was MC-80b MC-90 was the class that made his ship obsolete. Wink

MC-80 is smaller than an ISD, however not by much, it was said to take on an ISD by itself with considerable confedence.

Home One was a MC-80b Cruiser that Admiral Akbar commanded during the battle over Endor.

Nebulon frigates were tiny 300 meter escourt ships, the Millinium Falcon was docked at one whilst Luke was having his hand "repaired". It was the hopsital ship.

EDIT: and yay, i got one right! LOL thank you VCRs!
« Last Edit: December 11, 2005, 02:53:35 AM by LordsofKobol » Logged

The Cylons Were Created By Man.
They Evolved.
They Rebelled.
There are many copies.
And they have a Plan.


Admiral Adama
have you done 127 in a jeep? thats right

Offline Offline

Posts: 1026



WWW
« Reply #111 on: December 11, 2005, 05:46:07 AM »

oh they were tiny! the melinuum falcon was wider than it.  and it was a medical frigate not fit for battle
Logged

Why battlestar galactica is better than star trek:

Can't do that in a Sov.
LordsofKobol

Offline Offline

Posts: 356



WWW
« Reply #112 on: December 11, 2005, 08:29:28 AM »

yes, they were skinny, the falcon was a very wide ship though, and it was that way for modular addons to the vessel if needed.  
Logged

The Cylons Were Created By Man.
They Evolved.
They Rebelled.
There are many copies.
And they have a Plan.


Casper
Commanding Officer, U.S.S. Griffin
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1428



« Reply #113 on: December 11, 2005, 09:37:44 AM »

nubulan-b frigates are mainly used as very small mobile bases for fighters, because well, the only thing they can do is hull fighters around and guard unimportant convoys. oh, and they are used as patrol ships as well. i'd say 4 nebulan-b frigates can take-on a standard ISD, they'll get the snot kicked out of em, but they'll bring down the isd with them.
Logged


Wind, Forrest, Fire, Mountain -Sun Tzu's "The Art of War"

"My candle burns at both ends- It will not last the night. but ah, my friends, and oh my foes it gives a lovely light." -Edna St. Vincent Millay
teh-plaf

Offline Offline

Posts: 140


« Reply #114 on: December 11, 2005, 02:58:35 PM »

not even close IMO, 4 neb-b's could only threaten a shrike, maybe a dreadnought class
Logged
[TD]Roach

Offline Offline

Posts: 1138



WWW
« Reply #115 on: December 11, 2005, 06:11:34 PM »

thi si an star trek trivia isn't it? (just checking)
Logged



THAT'S WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU PLAY FLEETOPS
Rhaz

Offline Offline

Posts: 683



« Reply #116 on: December 12, 2005, 02:50:19 AM »

True True.
No you'd need like a dozen Nebula B's (Not counting Fighter support)
To tackle an ISD...as it has alot of Turbolasers.
To take an ISD II? Don't bother...its heavy turbolasers would chew those frigates up.
Its all about the fighters, 3 nebula B's could win if provided with ample well motivated Alliance squadrons of X-wings/E-wings and Y-wings/B-wings, but if the ISD Had Tie Avenger or Defender fighters on board it could really **** up those Rebels. (Even if those two classes were REALLY rare). In a fight like that its all down to who has the best or most (As imperials Meatshield their ISD's with ties).

MC80 and 80a cruisers were not a match for ISD's in terms of Firepower.
They had redundant shielding however, that meant they could out last their imperial counterparts, but the ISD II had much better firepower (Albeit Weaker shields and Lower Maximal Velocity than an ISD I).

The MC80b as a part of a fleet destroyed a SUper Star Destroyer (Executor Type) under the command of Rogue Warlord Zsinj. Although it was easily capable of soloing an ISD and coming out successful, it was utterly destroyed by Silencer-7 (A large world devastator with the firepower of an Imperator class Star Destroyer). This is just the Mon Remonda, I know little of other ships of similar build. The MC90 was its successor, and the successor to that was the Mediator Battle Cruiser, which is my personal favorite Mon Calamari Ship. But in the tough times after the Empire, they found it hard to produce more ships and so began refitting ISD's to meet their needs in the form of the Nebula and Rejuvenator Class. They also refit VSD's for service, and named them Republic Class Star Destroyers.  These refit ISD's were more than a match for an MC90 but took a backseat role to the Mediators. Teehee.
« Last Edit: December 12, 2005, 03:02:55 AM by Rhaz » Logged

"Everyone knows Decepticons can't ball!"
Fullphaser
Star Fool

Offline Offline

Posts: 536



WWW
« Reply #117 on: December 12, 2005, 04:30:24 AM »

Quote
thi si an star trek trivia isn't it? (just checking)
 LOL I guess that is a no oh here is an interesting one, don't know if it has been asked, but what ship appears in the most nubmer of episodes (non lead) class is the only thing needed
Logged

If necessity is the mother of invention, than want must be the father
[ Phaser Labs | Fullphaser's Rants | My Youtube ]
[TD]Roach

Offline Offline

Posts: 1138



WWW
« Reply #118 on: December 12, 2005, 05:49:38 AM »

excelcior? or miranda?
Logged



THAT'S WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU PLAY FLEETOPS
Fullphaser
Star Fool

Offline Offline

Posts: 536



WWW
« Reply #119 on: December 13, 2005, 05:34:38 AM »

funny you ask when I was doing the research I was wondering about that two, but someone counted and the award goes to the excelcior (not sure weather or not to trust Memory alpha though) http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Excelsior_class
Logged

If necessity is the mother of invention, than want must be the father
[ Phaser Labs | Fullphaser's Rants | My Youtube ]
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

© 2003-2008 DOCa Cola. All rights reserved.
Star Trek and related marks are trademarks of Paramount Pictures.
Powered by Joomla
Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com