TMD45X
Offline
Posts: 42
|
 |
« on: November 04, 2005, 01:57:00 AM » |
|
Why would people logon a foum just to aruge with someone? it doesent make any sense.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"The Strongest Of The Strong Can Be Defeated By The Weakest Of Adversaries"-TMD45X October 2004
|
|
|
RedShirt
Per Philosophia, Clarus. Per Clarus, Veritas.
Offline
Posts: 2767
En Veritas, Voluntas.
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2005, 02:18:43 AM » |
|
That's the stupidest thing I have EVER heard!!! Isn't it OBVIOUS that people need EMOTIONAL REALEASE... lol, j/k Ya, it is kinda wierd... you'd think people would argue enough offline... Go figure...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Freedom of speech is an American concept, so i don't give it any value." ~ Dean Stacey, investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission.
He heard the case against journalist Mark Steyn. Steyn was accused of offending Muslims.
|
|
|
teh-plaf
Offline
Posts: 140
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2005, 03:50:48 AM » |
|
Well if you accept the fact that people do that and apply some sociology or psychology, you would understand why certain types do
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ewm90
Good old dyslexic
Offline
Posts: 5542
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2005, 04:17:18 AM » |
|
i dont think eny one logs in to the forum to at least i hope not. some pepal just have a problom with discuing things in aproperit manor.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TMD45X
Offline
Posts: 42
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2005, 04:44:08 AM » |
|
Theres no point to be aruging over little things, especialy over a foum topic. Like politics for exemple.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 04, 2005, 04:45:43 AM by TMD45X »
|
Logged
|
"The Strongest Of The Strong Can Be Defeated By The Weakest Of Adversaries"-TMD45X October 2004
|
|
|
ewm90
Good old dyslexic
Offline
Posts: 5542
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2005, 05:34:09 AM » |
|
i agree if thay are debated properly and respecfall thare is not need to argue
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
-=B!G=-The Black Baron
Offline
Posts: 3202
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2005, 11:39:58 AM » |
|
In some topics people are bound to be arguing with each other, especially with so many different nations on this forum. So for me if someone opens a political thread, or something else simmilar to that that persone is just asking for a fight. As you see, some people really care about the views seriously and will never bow down and admit they are wrong. Now if 2 or more of such people meet and they all think they are totally right they WILL argue at some point. So my solution: dont open topics that have "arguing" potencial
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
*^* "My power is discombobulatingly devastating I could feel his muscle tissues collapse under my force. It's ludicrous these mortals even attempt to enter my realm."~Mike Tyson
|
|
|
[TD]Roach
Offline
Posts: 1138
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2005, 12:31:47 PM » |
|
well basically all the forum fight topics all surrounds about the USA and how wrong it is and what should you do to prevent it and then how bad it is and then what you should do to prevent it and then how bad that is and how you should prevent it etc etc etc so you have 40 pages of the same ongoing cicle and then people get annoyed i can always start a topic about the 3 liquidation of 3 dutch drug barons in one week
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
THAT'S WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU PLAY FLEETOPS
|
|
|
ewm90
Good old dyslexic
Offline
Posts: 5542
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: November 04, 2005, 12:57:59 PM » |
|
well i triyed to in past poll threads tolk about things pertaning to uther contrys but thay did not last two long. i am all ways oppined to tolk aboout uther stuff if thare is some one how wonts to talk about it.
well i can make evry one happy. thare will all was be some one how finds a topic anoing.
if it got to 40 pages that meens thare is alot of intrest for it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Eufnoc
Star Trek Armada II: Fleet Operation’s Tournament Staff
Offline
Posts: 4183
Star Trek Armada II: Fleet Operation’s Tournament
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2005, 05:27:10 PM » |
|
or its the same two people arguing with each other, the pol thread part two was basicly preator you and sotime myself and doanld
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RedShirt
Per Philosophia, Clarus. Per Clarus, Veritas.
Offline
Posts: 2767
En Veritas, Voluntas.
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: November 05, 2005, 12:09:24 AM » |
|
Hmmm... I have the distinct feeling that this will most likely play itself out in an argument...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Freedom of speech is an American concept, so i don't give it any value." ~ Dean Stacey, investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission.
He heard the case against journalist Mark Steyn. Steyn was accused of offending Muslims.
|
|
|
ewm90
Good old dyslexic
Offline
Posts: 5542
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: November 05, 2005, 12:18:59 AM » |
|
thare is a difrants between an agumant and a debate. some times at ponts the debates did tern to agumats but 80% of the time this where in controle and respecfull.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RedShirt
Per Philosophia, Clarus. Per Clarus, Veritas.
Offline
Posts: 2767
En Veritas, Voluntas.
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: November 05, 2005, 12:21:49 AM » |
|
I was joking.................... well, on second thought, mabye i wasn't.......
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Freedom of speech is an American concept, so i don't give it any value." ~ Dean Stacey, investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission.
He heard the case against journalist Mark Steyn. Steyn was accused of offending Muslims.
|
|
|
|
|
|