EWM read my post  without pollution hurricanes still existed and this hurricane wasn't any different because it is common this time of year that they arrive around florida and new orleans so it isn't a cause of pollution. maybe the frequency of hurricanes can be a cause of global warming but there isn't proof that there is a direct like to the amount of hurricanes and they way we warm up the earth. So you cannot approve that theory or dissaprove unless you are GOD. the only thing the scientists can be certain is  that we are warming up the earth, the rest is theory.

so it had nothing to do with katrina. otherwise i could have blamed El Nino of being a sign of global warming but that is also a natural event. and you can't hold several presidents for account because how much do you recycle and do you use other transportation then your car to go do the groceries. basically we are lazy as it comes to saving the earth because i know i could recycle 90 of my waste but basically nobody does it. even if there are facilities for them.

Tropical storms may be growing in overall intensity due to human-induced global warming, according to a new study by leading hurricane researcher Kerry Emanuel. His report, which has generated controversy among climate specialists, was published earlier this month in the journal Nature. Emanuel looked comprehensively at storm data since the mid-1970s and concluded that the destructive power of hurricanes has nearly doubled over the past three decades at least partially because of human-induced global warming. Critics of the study say hurricanes are not intensifying and that the cause of the rising ocean temperature is natural, not human-made.

so in other words only a theory and only a slight in crease not just creating F5 hurricanes from F1 and read the last line


It's made many wonder if global warming is bringing the wrath of the planet down upon all our heads. Kerry Emanuel, a professor of atmospheric science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who has studied historical records of hurricanes around the globe, said the answer is yes and no.

so not the cause of pollution directly.

and the german one is very one sided but basically it only states only about global woraming and the effects not that katrina is an example of global warming and you keep forgetting that the carebean and the mexican gold is a tornado rich area and each year is different and varies from intensity. and it was already predicted that there would be such an event sometime in the future so i don't know what makes it an indication that it might be a signal of global warning
 

he might of had a detailed simulation of the out lined problems, but does it come up in day to day bases, i am sure theres that job around your house that needs doing, but theres other more pressing matters (9/11 war on iraq, war on terror, election).


edit: does anyone else think this is fast becoming a political and blame thread?

i just find it weird to blame a NATURAL disaster to some twisted way to something the government could have prevented by doing the kyoto thing.  I wonder what kind of pollution you need to start an earthquacke then. I it like looking for some kind of weair d reason to find a logical answer on blaming a the cause of such a naturual event on someone.  

nope, the lawn it moved plants are water and the walk has all redy ben swepted up.

it is bush #1 job to pretect this contery. if he can not do that he was not business mesing in uther contrys.

it is we need to get back on topic...

Aesir he is the comander and cheef the buck stops with him.

[TD]Roach i dont under stand no one is blaming the NATURAL disaster?

yes it is hard but thats his job and if he cant do it he shood not be the comander and cheef.

thats trow about polatishons but some are more compadent than uthers.

i hope this mess from Katrina is not sweept under the rug as just a nuther harbal sichation.

good point, and this thread is starting to sound like a blame thread, eventhough i'm fine with burning bush for any reason what so ever,  maliciously fictitious or not