Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow Forum arrow Fleet Operationsarrow Strategyarrow My Federation strategy

December 05, 2008, 04:16:29 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Overview   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: My Federation strategy  (Read 1096 times)
Skitzeh

Offline Offline

Posts: 181



WWW
« on: August 16, 2005, 03:44:59 PM »

I use atleast 3 fleets in one single armada most of the time, each with between 8 and 16 ships and an additional 2 fleets if resources permit.

Fleet 1 = Defiant Class - Their hull strength makes them ideal for destroying the largest of vessels/stations and their size means that many torpedos miss easily, great in both offence and defence.

Fleet 2 = Intrepid Class - Very good for combatting the Rheinn class and similar ships, their photons give them a firepower advantage against the medium sized ships and the Tricobalt Torpedos are a great way to take out those vessels that drift just wide of your fleet, however vs large vessels and stations the Intrepid class is weak.

Fleet 3 = Akira Class - Fantastic for taking out the smallest ships, also great fire on the largest, especially cubes. The Point Defence makes them fantastic vs all torpedo loaded ships but very weak vs all phaser and disrupter heavy vessels.

Additional Fleet 1 = Sovereign Class - Their quantum torpedos make them ideal for taking out the largest vessels and stations while their phasers are powerful enough to deal with all ship sizes. Their shield and hull strength is high enough to take a fair beating which makes them the best all-round ship.

Additional Fleet 2 = Repair/Support - In this fleet I usually have 2 Canaveral class ships to each Newton class I have, ideally I would have 4 Newton class with 8 Canaveral class vessels and, if I can spare them, 4 Excelsior-II class ships.


I micromanage all my fights, check what I'm fighting and direct my fleets to take out individual targets that are threats to my other fleets.
« Last Edit: August 16, 2005, 03:56:32 PM by Skitzeh » Logged
DOCa Cola
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2605



« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2005, 04:20:41 PM »

this is a splitted topic from the 'various strategies' thread. i intended the subforum to be used like this where you make threads about your personal strategies or games and then discuss about them. any critisism or ideas (desired) go to the "forum/site quality" forum NOT in here. thx Smiley

btw. i came up with the very cool thread title "my federation strategy"  LOL
« Last Edit: August 16, 2005, 04:22:12 PM by DOCa Cola » Logged

Skitzeh

Offline Offline

Posts: 181



WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2005, 04:27:40 PM »

lol, awww <3 Smiley aint u a sweety.  Tongue  
Logged
-=B!G=-The Black Baron

Offline Offline

Posts: 3064



« Reply #3 on: August 16, 2005, 08:33:29 PM »

Quote
Fleet 1 = Defiant Class - Their hull strength makes them ideal for destroying the largest of vessels/stations and their size means that many torpedos miss easily, great in both offence and defence.

Actually their pulse weapons are ideal for destroying the smallest targets Tongue
They only deal 60% of damage to big targets Sad


Quote
Fleet 2 = Intrepid Class - Very good for combatting the Rheinn class and similar ships, their photons give them a firepower advantage against the medium sized ships and the Tricobalt Torpedos are a great way to take out those vessels that drift just wide of your fleet, however vs large vessels and stations the Intrepid class is weak.

I use intrepids mainly for battleships though, they have a very weak phaser but a very strong torp plus many HPs. So again if you shoot at small targets u loost 40% of your torps, so again in my opinion your wrong Tongue


Quote
Fleet 3 = Akira Class - Fantastic for taking out the smallest ships, also great fire on the largest, especially cubes. The Point Defence makes them fantastic vs all torpedo loaded ships but very weak vs all phaser and disrupter heavy vessels.

Akiras are good vs everything due to their phaser which always deals 100% dam and never misses plus they have quite high HP. Not high enough for sieging a base head on with only Akiras Smiley


Quote
Additional Fleet 1 = Sovereign Class - Their quantum torpedos make them ideal for taking out the largest vessels and stations while their phasers are powerful enough to deal with all ship sizes. Their shield and hull strength is high enough to take a fair beating which makes them the best all-round ship.

I totally agree with you there Smiley The best fed sieging ship in my opinion Smiley


Quote
Additional Fleet 2 = Repair/Support - In this fleet I usually have 2 Canaveral class ships to each Newton class I have, ideally I would have 4 Newton class with 8 Canaveral class vessels and, if I can spare them, 4 Excelsior-II class ships.

Thats a nice idea to have Smiley
Logged

*^*
"My power is discombobulatingly devastating I could feel his muscle tissues collapse under my force. It's ludicrous these mortals even attempt to enter my realm."~Mike Tyson

R.I.P. Legend Sad

Skitzeh

Offline Offline

Posts: 181



WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 17, 2005, 12:43:00 AM »

Quote
Actually their pulse weapons are ideal for destroying the smallest targets Tongue
They only deal 60% of damage to big targets Sad
I said their hull strength made them ideal for taking on large ships. Smiley The pulse phasers are less effective against the largest ships but even at 60% they are very dangerous when combined with the hull strength they can endure alot of punishment. I admit tho that with less than 12 defiant class ships you sometimes have to take alot of damage, which is why I tend to focus alot of my resources on building defiant class ships.

Quote
I use intrepids mainly for battleships though, they have a very weak phaser but a very strong torp plus many HPs. So again if you shoot at small targets u loost 40% of your torps, so again in my opinion your wrong Tongue
Ok, maybe I am slightly wrong... but thinking of it from a more development point of view, Akiras are great for taking on Rheinn type ships when you can get Akiras, but very often it seems to me that your opponent has upgraded Rheinn class ships before you've even researched Chassis 2. Wink
Logged
coolhandab

Offline Offline

Posts: 528



WWW
« Reply #5 on: August 17, 2005, 01:22:39 AM »

I still like the excelsior-2 better than the sovereign. The long-range weapons really make the difference when showering someone's base with quantums, and you only lose 30 shield points compared to a sovvy.

Oh and the increased torpedo hit chance against medium targets is also VERY nice to counter those enemy cruisers coming out to engage you.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2005, 01:23:34 AM by coolhandab » Logged

"Centurion, ready plasma torpedos. We shall show these meddling humans how the Star Empire conducts negotiations."
--nemo me impune lacessit
coolhandab

Offline Offline

Posts: 528



WWW
« Reply #6 on: August 17, 2005, 01:25:09 AM »

Quote
Ok, maybe I am slightly wrong... but thinking of it from a more development point of view, Akiras are great for taking on Rheinn type ships when you can get Akiras, but very often it seems to me that your opponent has upgraded Rheinn class ships before you've even researched Chassis 2. Wink
Very true, that's one of the first things I do as a Romulan.
Logged

"Centurion, ready plasma torpedos. We shall show these meddling humans how the Star Empire conducts negotiations."
--nemo me impune lacessit
-=B!G=-The Black Baron

Offline Offline

Posts: 3064



« Reply #7 on: August 17, 2005, 08:23:36 AM »

Feds have Monsoons for destruction of other races destroyers Tongue
In FO every ship has its counterpart which can be build at about the same time Smiley

Quote
QUOTE (The BlacK BaRoN @ Aug 16 2005, 08:33 PM)
Actually their pulse weapons are ideal for destroying the smallest targets tongue.gif
They only deal 60% of damage to big targets sad.gif

I said their hull strength made them ideal for taking on large ships. smile.gif The pulse phasers are less effective against the largest ships but even at 60% they are very dangerous when combined with the hull strength they can endure alot of punishment. I admit tho that with less than 12 defiant class ships you sometimes have to take alot of damage, which is why I tend to focus alot of my resources on building defiant class ships.


Yah they have a lot of hull HPs, but just try to attack a cube once with them Wink Just for fun Cheesy
And I would much rather have 12 sovies than 12 defiants, or better yet 6sovies and 6defiants Wink
Logged

*^*
"My power is discombobulatingly devastating I could feel his muscle tissues collapse under my force. It's ludicrous these mortals even attempt to enter my realm."~Mike Tyson

R.I.P. Legend Sad

admiral max

Offline Offline

Posts: 342



« Reply #8 on: August 17, 2005, 08:26:13 PM »

dont forget all these ideas are going to be scrapped for the new balancing lol but keep using them for know
Logged

best Admiral in starfleet
coolhandab

Offline Offline

Posts: 528



WWW
« Reply #9 on: August 18, 2005, 01:45:45 AM »

Quote
dont forget all these ideas are going to be scrapped for the new balancing lol but keep using them for know
Indeed, I'm on the edge of my seat waiting for the new performance specifications to come out. I've already heard that the romulan destroyers won't kick quite as much butt as they used to ...
Logged

"Centurion, ready plasma torpedos. We shall show these meddling humans how the Star Empire conducts negotiations."
--nemo me impune lacessit
Skitzeh

Offline Offline

Posts: 181



WWW
« Reply #10 on: August 18, 2005, 08:09:06 AM »

Well, I only just started playing FO so I figure may aswell get into as fast as... I know balancing is gonna change Tongue but if doin this nooby stuff now means i'll be better off when v3 comes out... well Cheesy its worth it.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

© 2003-2008 DOCa Cola. All rights reserved.
Star Trek and related marks are trademarks of Paramount Pictures.
Powered by Joomla
Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com