Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow Forum arrow Fleet Operationsarrow Feature Requestarrow Heavy Plasma Torpedose

January 08, 2009, 03:26:56 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Overview   Help Search Login Register  
Poll
Question: ? ¿ ? ¿ ? ¿ ? ¿
asom - 1 (10%)
good - 3 (30%)
ok - 0 (0%)
bad - 1 (10%)
sucks - 4 (40%)
(Noll Vote) - 1 (10%)
Total Voters: 9

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: Heavy Plasma Torpedose  (Read 3296 times)
coolhandab

Offline Offline

Posts: 528



WWW
« Reply #45 on: August 02, 2005, 04:56:34 AM »

There are 8 quantum and photon tubes on a Sovereign in addition to the ventral rapid fire turret:

http://www.ditl.org/index.htm?daymain=/hedarticle.php?5

DITL comes up with a salvo strength of 37, which is a VERY conservative estimate. In any case, these salvos would take 3 seconds or less to fire, reload, and be ready to fire again.

I've also assumed that all the photon tubes have been upgraded to quantum capability, which seems reasonable if Starfleet had begun mass-production of quantums. In any case, you're looking at 4 quantums a second plus 8 triple-firing photon tubes cycling every 2 seconds or so, for a grand total of 14 torps per second sustained firing rate.
Logged

"Centurion, ready plasma torpedos. We shall show these meddling humans how the Star Empire conducts negotiations."
--nemo me impune lacessit
-=B!G=-The Black Baron

Offline Offline

Posts: 3189



« Reply #46 on: August 02, 2005, 08:44:53 AM »

But if u have like 5 negh vars and they all fireing at the sovie at once, it will be gone in a matter of seconds too Sad
Logged

*^*
"My power is discombobulatingly devastating I could feel his muscle tissues collapse under my force. It's ludicrous these mortals even attempt to enter my realm."~Mike Tyson

warp

Offline Offline

Posts: 353


watch dog


WWW
« Reply #47 on: August 02, 2005, 10:13:10 AM »

I think tis a good idea
Logged



Cpt Ryan
Fleet Ops mob boss

Offline Offline

Posts: 1910


There is no spoon


« Reply #48 on: August 02, 2005, 12:43:22 PM »

Quote
Actually the Enterprise subtype would be the second edition, given it has bigger impulse engines, cloak detecting sensors, and a new targetting system. Lakota would be the third generation.
that could be considered a general upgrade, the Lakota was tampered with so much that it was able to cause a lot of trouble to the Defiant. Tongue

Quote
It seems logical that the dorsal weapon pod could be upgraded to burst-firing quantum capability.
why? its only pulse fire as it is. & the fact it has about 15 of these pulse fire tubes means it has quite alot of firepower as it is, i doubt starfleet would tamper with this design, only to decrease the number of tubes overall just to give it quantums in the weapons pod.

Quote
There are 8 quantum and photon tubes on a Sovereign in addition to the ventral rapid fire turret:

http://www.ditl.org/index.htm?daymain=/hedarticle.php?5

DITL comes up with a salvo strength of 37, which is a VERY conservative estimate. In any case, these salvos would take 3 seconds or less to fire, reload, and be ready to fire again.

I've also assumed that all the photon tubes have been upgraded to quantum capability, which seems reasonable if Starfleet had begun mass-production of quantums
you seem to assume alot Tongue  since when have you ever seen quantums on a soveriegn being fired from anywhere other than the turret? in first contact the quantums were fired openly, but only from the turret. In nemesis, the quantums were fire only from the turret, even when they had forced the scimitar to decloak, photons were fired from the other tubes when it was outside the turret's firing arc. now this is either because the burst fire tubes aren't big enough to fire the quantums or it doesn't have enough quantums to equip the other tubes, either way these "statistics" you have come up with don't mean anything :geek:  
Logged

"The past makes us who we are... forget your past and you have no future"-Me.. i think
"better to send 5 lions than 500 sheep"- some guy i can't remember
"DANCE FOOL!!... and make it a nice dance"- another guy i cant remember
coolhandab

Offline Offline

Posts: 528



WWW
« Reply #49 on: August 02, 2005, 03:54:57 PM »

I acknowledged that all the integral tubes fire photons. I just said it seems like they could be upgraded in the future. And the 14 per second number still stands, if the integral tubes really are only triple fire. If they're really type 4 burst the number is more like 28 per second.

Also, the Akira's weapon pod has 7 pulse fire photon tubes. These could at the very least be converted to 7 pulse fire quantum, like the defiant has, and maybe 2 or 3 type 4 burst quantums would fit in there too. Even 2 burst tubes would have much more firepower than 7 pulse tubes.
Logged

"Centurion, ready plasma torpedos. We shall show these meddling humans how the Star Empire conducts negotiations."
--nemo me impune lacessit
Cpt Ryan
Fleet Ops mob boss

Offline Offline

Posts: 1910


There is no spoon


« Reply #50 on: August 02, 2005, 04:03:03 PM »

Quote
Also, the Akira's weapon pod has 7 pulse fire photon tubes. These could at the very least be converted to 7 pulse fire quantum, like the defiant has, and maybe 2 or 3 type 4 burst quantums would fit in there too. Even 2 burst tubes would have much more firepower than 7 pulse tubes.
more likely they would just leave the akira as it is cos it hasn't performed half bad, they would focus on the prometheus and and any newer designs, that may be initially capable of using quantums. and i don't think quantums are in mass production, at least not on the standards that starfleet would like them to be.

for the sovie, yeah whatever, still don't think it would outgun 4 or 5 warbirds/negh'vars.  tell me.. whats the fire power of a warbird. and how quickly did the IKS Negh'var take down the shields of DS9.
« Last Edit: August 02, 2005, 04:03:32 PM by Cpt Ryan » Logged

"The past makes us who we are... forget your past and you have no future"-Me.. i think
"better to send 5 lions than 500 sheep"- some guy i can't remember
"DANCE FOOL!!... and make it a nice dance"- another guy i cant remember
coolhandab

Offline Offline

Posts: 528



WWW
« Reply #51 on: August 03, 2005, 02:15:20 AM »

Hehe this is fun. I totally agree with you that if Starfleet has limited resources they would concentrate them into new combat ships instead of refitting old combat ships, they seem to have a history of designing all new classes where refitting would do the job as well.

As far as the firepower of a warbird, it's terrible. From TNG we know that a warbird has about 60-70% of the weapons of a pre-dominion war Galaxy. These ships also took a heavy beating in the Dom War, almost half the warbirds engaged were destroyed.

If we're talking Norexan warbirds, we can infer from Nemesis that a Sovereign can easily handle 2 of them (comparing the beatings they took from the Scimitar in such short order compared to the E-E)

Martok's Neghvar that took down DS9's shields used its planetary bombardment type 18 disruptors. It's up to argument whether these weapons can effectively target a ship even as large as a Sovereign  cheesy  
Logged

"Centurion, ready plasma torpedos. We shall show these meddling humans how the Star Empire conducts negotiations."
--nemo me impune lacessit
Cpt Ryan
Fleet Ops mob boss

Offline Offline

Posts: 1910


There is no spoon


« Reply #52 on: August 03, 2005, 02:32:56 AM »

Quote
Martok's Neghvar that took down DS9's shields used its planetary bombardment type 18 disruptors. It's up to argument whether these weapons can effectively target a ship even as large as a Sovereign  cheesy
they don't rely on any targeting system like a torpedo, so i reckon that even 1 negh'var would land some hits, even if lucky Tongue  then voila sovie shields are gone, another lucky hit and its crippled Cheesy  
Logged

"The past makes us who we are... forget your past and you have no future"-Me.. i think
"better to send 5 lions than 500 sheep"- some guy i can't remember
"DANCE FOOL!!... and make it a nice dance"- another guy i cant remember
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

© 2003-2008 DOCa Cola. All rights reserved.
Star Trek and related marks are trademarks of Paramount Pictures.
Powered by Joomla
Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com