KL0K
 Offline
Posts: 962
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: March 27, 2004, 10:55:31 PM » |
|
but they picked up a few things from the TOS. like the console, spock watched everytime and stuff like that. but the general failure is, to think that there is (or could be) a balance of the shows.
but on the other hand, i wouldn´t like to see a new TOS, cause u cant really replace the old (good) actors. even if i start laughin when i see the movies, and crappy effects, i dont really wanna see a remake. maybe a remake of the movies, but not of the series..
jus ma 2 pennys
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PREATOR DEFIANT
Offline
Posts: 4518
|
|
« Reply #61 on: March 28, 2004, 05:20:17 AM » |
|
OR just keep goin from DS9 and Voyager which they should have done, I wanna see some Enterprise-E combat.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
  *^* |
|
|
KL0K
Offline
Posts: 962
|
|
« Reply #62 on: March 28, 2004, 06:27:25 AM » |
|
hm.. but i wanna see the evolution of the federationships... from getting shield technology and p-torps, to phaserbanks on the hull... the upcoming war with the klingons and first contacts and war with the roms... all the stuff like this... but from the point of view, fixed and based on a time line, they should have done that crap after voyager... but if i try to imagine what they could work out... a big war with the species 8472? or upcoming dominion again? or borg bigger an bigger? i think it would be the same ever... or they could bring some stuff from older cultures in, like that stuff in the starfleet command game trilogy... like the hydrans... or the gorn... but thats all fiction of one guy sittin on his bed in germany *lol*
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 28, 2004, 06:29:47 AM by KL0K »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PREATOR DEFIANT
Offline
Posts: 4518
|
|
« Reply #63 on: March 28, 2004, 06:57:56 AM » |
|
I would too but I'd like it even more if we could get some Enterprise-E 1 on 1 action with some Romulans and Klingons and some other scary races.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
*^* |
|
|
akridine
Offline
Posts: 15
|
|
« Reply #64 on: March 29, 2004, 05:16:48 AM » |
|
I would too but I'd like it even more if we could get some Enterprise-E 1 on 1 action with some Romulans and Klingons and some other scary races. i completley agree. the soverign class is supposed to be the most advanced ship in starfleet but so far it seemed like a complete wuss in the movies and game. has anyone else noticed that the guy who plays captain archer in enterprise is a well over the top captain kirk wannabe HUGE gaps between his words "fire......a.....photon.....torpeado......target....their.....warp..core" |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PREATOR DEFIANT
Offline
Posts: 4518
|
|
« Reply #65 on: March 29, 2004, 05:43:45 AM » |
|
i completley agree. the soverign class is supposed to be the most advanced ship in starfleet but so far it seemed like a complete wuss in the movies and game. I disagree, being no match for the Scimitar and being able to disable it took some major guts and the sovern showed she won't be pushed around.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
*^* |
|
|
Admiral Chemix
Offline
Posts: 101
|
|
« Reply #66 on: April 04, 2004, 01:39:52 PM » |
|
If TOS were too be remade by berman and barga, they would screw over trek completely. Fire them. Then get back to the future. Anounce Ent non-cannon. I'm sick of all this prequel crap. It's too hard for paramount to acomplish. I personaly think they should leave it ALONE. Voyager made peace with species 8472 so I don't think a war againts the federation with them would be such a good seiries. How about a seiries taking place outside of the federation, a romulan seiries or something. Or a seiries about a civil war that occurs in the federation after the events of nemesis. Or a seiries where the feds are cought up in a conflict between the romulans and the cardassians. Or a seiries based on a romulan civil war. Anything but another screw up prequel. I don't have a problem with the interior of the enterprise. Just the exterior, which is the old akira model with a few changes and a gold tinted paint job. Get a shuttle like ship or something. A bulky ship. A ship that cannot beat any foe.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KL0K
Offline
Posts: 962
|
|
« Reply #67 on: April 04, 2004, 03:55:09 PM » |
|
hm, yea.. a few interesting ideas...
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 04, 2004, 03:59:08 PM by KL0K »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Blackelf
Offline
Posts: 10
|
|
« Reply #68 on: May 27, 2004, 11:43:37 AM » |
|
Just a thought that comes to my mind when I see that signature with the scimitar: Nemesis was crap imho, I liked all the original movies, first contact was ok, but nemesis..lol. The Scimitar is a complete misconception, doesnt simply fit into StarTrek. How the heck were the remens able to build a more powerful ship then all the other empires, and how did they build its so quick?.. Where did the Technology come from? How comes the Klingons havent build such a great ship? (well actually they did: Warfs Flagship in the Mirror Ep in DS9, which was also a missconception (2km long)) And then the fact that they could fire when cloaked: Now Imagine a movie in the Future.... a battle between some ships, all cloaked, all undetectable, thats crap. They shouldent have tuoched the cloak: cant fire when cloaked (which is only logical, isent it?, If theres any emission from the ship, I should be possible to detect it).. Just some thoughts ..  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 27, 2004, 11:44:36 AM by Blackelf »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PREATOR DEFIANT
Offline
Posts: 4518
|
|
« Reply #69 on: May 27, 2004, 06:36:44 PM » |
|
I personally liked Nemesis for it's space battle where we finally get to see the sovern 1 vs 1 duken it and it's relativly few screw-ups.
Now I can tell you something that dosent make 1 bit of sense, the Defiant class. In Star Trek, bigger has always been better so having a ship smaller then a Constitution class capable of taking on an Excelsior class just throws us in a completely differant direction. How can a warp core about 4 decks long be more powerful then a Galaxys 10 deck long core?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
*^* |
|
|
KL0K
Offline
Posts: 962
|
|
« Reply #70 on: May 27, 2004, 07:03:24 PM » |
|
with a better config..  but then it would still make no sense cause they didnnt adapt that to their bigger ships.. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Optec
|
|
« Reply #71 on: May 27, 2004, 07:30:15 PM » |
|
well i think the defiant's warp core generates less power then the one of a galaxy class, but a defiant class is designed for combat and only uses the energy for its weapons and shieldings. A galaxy warpcore does also have to feed holodecks, cartography, replicators, life support for hundreds of rooms, nice lightning in every edge  and so on |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 27, 2004, 07:30:45 PM by Optec »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DOCa Cola
Offline
Posts: 2603
|
|
« Reply #72 on: May 27, 2004, 08:32:11 PM » |
|
Yea, i totally agree. the defiant is designed as warship and i think the engeneers calculated that extra stuff like holodecks into the warpdrive capabilites so it is much more power resources for this size of vessel than required.
DOCa Cola
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PREATOR DEFIANT
Offline
Posts: 4518
|
|
« Reply #73 on: May 27, 2004, 08:49:34 PM » |
|
No thats not it, they say it generators more power then a Galaxy classes warp core and rivals a Soverns core. So i'm left with many questions...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
*^* |
|
|
|
|
|
