Oh it's so simple to think that because ships died quickly in the movies, that they must be weak ass. Sorry to burst your bubble, but no, they can easily hold their own against most ships in the galaxy. Only a moron would think that because they were easy pickings for the Scimitar, means that they are poor gunned, armored, and shielded. The real reason is the writers. Awww poor baron cry.gif
Canon comes from tech manuals and the tech crews that work on making the shows, movies and also the designers who first make the ships on star trek, not from shows and movies.
Of course you know baron none of that is true, it's mere speculation, it's obviously off of the DITL which as we all know isn't quite right most of the time. Raw pwnage at it's finest laugh.gif tongue.gif
Ahhhh so they just make up ships and put them into manuals without ever being on any show, so thats how it works
If that is true than I am terribly sorry, than norexan is the strongest ship in all the galaxy, would that work for you?
Its really pointless to argue with you PD since anyone who is against u, u start insulting him and of course because most of the people here love romulans they back u up. And plizz tell me in which manual it says the norexan is soooooo damn strong

And just one more thing, if romulans are so strong and the best, why dont they have a bigger empire, why arent they considered as strong as the federation or the klingons.
Let me anwser that for u, its all because of the writters, they dont like the romulans
Oh and about that tac cube thing, acording to ditl every bug ship carries 40 trops, 40x100 is 4000, plus warp core breach plus........
And that would only scratch the paint of the tac cube huh
If that is true I really dont know what can destroy it
Dont forget that just a couple of fed ships destroyed one cube with the help of picards Enterprise-E

Im gonna stop posting in here now, hope u all see my point, if u dont to bad for you