Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow Forum arrow Generalarrow Star Trekarrow Bop Versus A Warbird?

October 13, 2008, 12:45:10 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Overview   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 9
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: Bop Versus A Warbird?  (Read 5009 times)
Smoerebroed

Offline Offline

Posts: 489


The only Smoerenian from Planet Smoerland


« Reply #45 on: November 16, 2004, 01:15:28 PM »

Salaam!

Does a warbird have aft weapons? If so then I would assume no, but if he has no aft weapons, then ATTACK!!! I think it takes some time to target a ship with the tractor beam, so decloak fire cloak, and so on.
Logged

I have killed thousands. I have killed proud young warriors and wise old rulers. I have killed mothers with babes in their arms. I have killed the just, the wicked, and the beautiful. I have done this for two thousand years in the service of His Divine Shadow and  apparently the fun never stops!
volume

Offline Offline

Posts: 188



WWW
« Reply #46 on: November 16, 2004, 01:37:02 PM »

how about we phone the high council and ask them?

Along with some peoples posts, they clearly state that BoP's are very strong for their size.. maybe two BoP's could do some serious damage, but i doubt it could destroy it all.. unless they kamakazed into the power supply. Tongue
Logged
coolhandab

Offline Offline

Posts: 528



WWW
« Reply #47 on: November 16, 2004, 04:17:08 PM »

Quote
the b'rel is armed to the teeth:
two wing-mounted disrupter cannons
two twin wing-mounted phaser cannons
1 photon/poleron torpedo launcher
Klingons don't have phasers or phaser cannons. And a little ship that's what, 40 to 60 meters long? isn't going to stand a chance against anything bigger than a Danube runabout.

But yeah the Norexans were developed because of the demonstrated weakness of the D'deridex's shields in the Dominion war. And the Enterprise - E lasted so long against the Scimitar for a few reasons: it's a Sovereign, the most powerful ship built in the Alpha Quadrant, and it's Picard's ship. Do you really expect it to just up and explode? hahahaha
Logged

"Centurion, ready plasma torpedos. We shall show these meddling humans how the Star Empire conducts negotiations."
--nemo me impune lacessit
Smoerebroed

Offline Offline

Posts: 489


The only Smoerenian from Planet Smoerland


« Reply #48 on: November 17, 2004, 12:03:36 PM »

I think a BOP can at least destroy a Sabre/ Saber class ship. The big problem for a BoP are strong shields and large weapon arcs.
Logged

I have killed thousands. I have killed proud young warriors and wise old rulers. I have killed mothers with babes in their arms. I have killed the just, the wicked, and the beautiful. I have done this for two thousand years in the service of His Divine Shadow and  apparently the fun never stops!
Fullphaser
Star Fool

Offline Offline

Posts: 513



WWW
« Reply #49 on: November 17, 2004, 02:06:32 PM »


Well I just don't see a bop winning on its own with the limited recources it has at its disposal, but I do like the whole ramming idea, It seems like the Klingons might do something just that desprate, and the right place would sure cause a lot of damage to a Derdrix. other than that even accounting for no sign of an aft weapons array and no manuverbility compared to the small bop the Warbird still has a massive firepower and shieldign advantage over the Bop. so I am left to wonder a comparison between a dominon bug and a bop as this might help us to see how the bop would do considering we already know how a fighter would do.

Fullphaser
Logged

If necessity is the mother of invention, than want must be the father
[ Phaser Labs | Fullphaser's Rants | My Youtube ]
coolhandab

Offline Offline

Posts: 528



WWW
« Reply #50 on: November 17, 2004, 06:55:07 PM »

I'm not so sure a B'rel could take down a Saber, it would depend an awful lot on surprise and the relative skills of the captains and crews. In my opinion it would be close. Especially if one ship or the other landed a hit or two from a torpedo weapon, it would be all over. Though I'm sure the Saber's shields are better.
Logged

"Centurion, ready plasma torpedos. We shall show these meddling humans how the Star Empire conducts negotiations."
--nemo me impune lacessit
PREATOR DEFIANT

Offline Offline

Posts: 4518



WWW
« Reply #51 on: November 17, 2004, 11:13:56 PM »

A Saber would most definately destroy a BoP, and probably a B'rel. K'vort is another story.
Logged

*^*
Fullphaser
Star Fool

Offline Offline

Posts: 513



WWW
« Reply #52 on: November 18, 2004, 01:50:49 AM »

I don't know about the loss of a Bop to a saber. Despite the saber's apparent warship like nature, it is still tactically underpowered and probably more shielded, considering that the ship was designed mainly to fight the borg I imagine the weapons reflect that combat stlye with quality over quanity, and that those weapons are versitle rather than powerful. The Bop however is a warship stem to stern, and could probably easily make up for shielding with powerful weapons for a ship of its size
Logged

If necessity is the mother of invention, than want must be the father
[ Phaser Labs | Fullphaser's Rants | My Youtube ]
coolhandab

Offline Offline

Posts: 528



WWW
« Reply #53 on: November 18, 2004, 04:05:26 AM »

Heh well if we want to really analyze this, consider that the Saber is firing a phaser beam, which probably isn't going to miss, especially considering the advanced sensor capabilities of a starfleet vessel. The BoP on the other hand has older electronics, or at least less impressive targeting capabilities, and can likely be fooled by the most advanced ECM, making it harder to hit the Saber, which in any case will be maneuvering rapidly against phased disruptors, which travel slowly and tend to miss small targets.

On the other hand the BoP has cloak and likely the element of surprise. In my opinion if the Klingon commander doesn't sufficiently damage the impulse engines and/or the phaser bank on his first pass he's dead.
Logged

"Centurion, ready plasma torpedos. We shall show these meddling humans how the Star Empire conducts negotiations."
--nemo me impune lacessit
PREATOR DEFIANT

Offline Offline

Posts: 4518



WWW
« Reply #54 on: November 18, 2004, 07:35:37 AM »

No a BoP would definately lose to a Saber no question. A b'rel class could put up a fight but lose also seeing as it's not too much more powerful then the BoP. K'vort would win because it's alot more heavily armed and shielded.
Logged

*^*
coolhandab

Offline Offline

Posts: 528



WWW
« Reply #55 on: November 18, 2004, 03:49:45 PM »

The K'Vort would still be vulnerable to torpedo strikes on its disruptors, shields or not. I know it looks cool to have them hanging off the wings like that, but it's a really dumb place to put something so important.
Logged

"Centurion, ready plasma torpedos. We shall show these meddling humans how the Star Empire conducts negotiations."
--nemo me impune lacessit
PREATOR DEFIANT

Offline Offline

Posts: 4518



WWW
« Reply #56 on: November 19, 2004, 02:30:37 AM »

Well a Saber is vunerable to a Torpedo strike to it's Torpedo launcher. I mean where else can you put the guns? You can't have then in the middle of the ship because then they can't fire.
Logged

*^*
Smoerebroed

Offline Offline

Posts: 489


The only Smoerenian from Planet Smoerland


« Reply #57 on: November 19, 2004, 02:22:08 PM »

hmm..... Everytime i read this thread, i read "no way a BoP will surely loose..." and so on. If this is true why the f*ck is the BoP still in use? Hmm. Ah I know it's the postal machine of the Klingon army, delivering the Post to the Battle-Front or the Klingons use the BoP to fly to the next fly-Through-Restaurant like Space Donalds or the like.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2004, 02:22:30 PM by Smoerebroed » Logged

I have killed thousands. I have killed proud young warriors and wise old rulers. I have killed mothers with babes in their arms. I have killed the just, the wicked, and the beautiful. I have done this for two thousand years in the service of His Divine Shadow and  apparently the fun never stops!
coolhandab

Offline Offline

Posts: 528



WWW
« Reply #58 on: November 19, 2004, 08:06:48 PM »

Yeah it's the delivery truck. Too bad it's so small, it would take a lot of deliveries to deliver anything.
Logged

"Centurion, ready plasma torpedos. We shall show these meddling humans how the Star Empire conducts negotiations."
--nemo me impune lacessit
Yaso Kuuhl

Offline Offline

Posts: 119



WWW
« Reply #59 on: November 19, 2004, 09:41:49 PM »

Another few thoughts:
- Warbirds most likely have rear firing disruptors. I seen them having a disruptor array at the very bottom of their hull. However, a few disruptor shots won't break through the shields of even a BoP very quickly, else the Duras Sisters's BoP would have been in more trouble against a Galaxy Class, even with them having no effective shield power and all.
- So it's very likely that the BoP can maneuver around enough to avoid the most heavy weapons fire, i.e. the Plasma Cannons and Pulse Disruptors. The little Klink could probably pour quite a lot of firepower into the D'deridex's shields before getting hit too often.
- This won't do him any good, though, as the Warbird's shields are simply too strong for him to break through. The BoP's shields, on the other hand, will eventually lose to the vastly superior firepower of a ship ten times it's size.

- BTW, would somebody please explain to me the difference between a Bird of Prey and a B'rel? I only know of two types of Klingon Birds of Prey. Small and Large.

About the BoP vs. aber thing:
Much the same as before, but less obvious. Saber has much more advanced technology and likely more firepower. Saber has better shields and better firing arcs. So eventually the Saber would win, except if the Klingons score a critical hit (destroy a warp nacelle, the torp launcher, the bridge, etc.)

Were this DS9, though, I wouldn't be surprised if a BoP destroyed a Saber in one disruptor salvo, though. I've seen weirder things.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2004, 09:42:59 PM by Yaso Kuuhl » Logged

Some people are pragmatists, taking things as they come and making the best of the choices available.
Some people are idealists, standing for principle and refusing to compromise.
And some people just act on any whim that enters their heads.
I pragmatically turn my whims into principles.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 9
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

© 2003-2008 DOCa Cola. All rights reserved.
Star Trek and related marks are trademarks of Paramount Pictures.
Powered by Joomla
Powered by SMF 1.1.6 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com