Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow Forum arrow Generalarrow Star Trekarrow Bop Versus A Warbird?

August 28, 2008, 05:25:25 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Overview   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: Bop Versus A Warbird?  (Read 4559 times)
coolhandab
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 528



WWW
« Reply #30 on: November 08, 2004, 06:07:57 AM »

The so-called D'Tai is definitely really a K'Vort made bigger for dramaturgic reasons. Definitely a really bad move by the TNG folks, they should have used vorchas instead. Oh well.
Logged

"Centurion, ready plasma torpedos. We shall show these meddling humans how the Star Empire conducts negotiations."
--nemo me impune lacessit
PREATOR DEFIANT
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4518



WWW
« Reply #31 on: November 09, 2004, 05:39:02 AM »

Well what they call it is another scale up of the BoP. Guess them Klingons don't know when to leave a hull design alone.
Logged

*^*
Lumpybob
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1718



« Reply #32 on: November 10, 2004, 10:39:04 PM »

when will they learn to leave the bird-of-prey alone. it is fine the way it is
Logged

Vincent Vega
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 267


Topic starter

WWW
« Reply #33 on: November 11, 2004, 04:27:32 PM »

the klingons love to do more with less
 
Logged

I could never figure this out, is "meow" woof in cat?
Would waffles have saved rome?
Im a real silly *******, get used to it.
DOOM was and still is the greatest FPS.
Lumpybob
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1718



« Reply #34 on: November 11, 2004, 05:42:51 PM »

the b'rel is armed to the teeth:
two wing-mounted disrupter cannons
two twin wing-mounted phaser cannons
1 photon/poleron torpedo launcher

about half a task force of these things can kic the sh*t out of most heavy fed ships
Logged

Sferimao
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 796



WWW
« Reply #35 on: November 11, 2004, 06:14:03 PM »

I think that Warbird should be stronger then BoP. It's a pity that we never saw D'deridex in Tv shows effective in combat. Actualy we often saw that they are very easily destroyed (seen in DS9 and Voyager series that included USS Prometheus).
Logged

Life is like a box of chocolate, you never  know what you are going to get. And this time you'll get an attack from 3 warbirds Muhaha.

                                             *^*
Yaso Kuuhl
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 119



WWW
« Reply #36 on: November 11, 2004, 07:09:17 PM »

I remember one scene from TNG where a three-shot disruptor burst from a D'deridex was enough to disable Enterprise. The rommies probably fried their disruptor cannons inthe process, but that still is some impressive firepower.

On the other hand, they're said to be less than enough shielded for their size, so they're awesome ships for surprise attacks, but won't survive in long-lasting slugging matches.
Logged

Some people are pragmatists, taking things as they come and making the best of the choices available.
Some people are idealists, standing for principle and refusing to compromise.
And some people just act on any whim that enters their heads.
I pragmatically turn my whims into principles.
RFO Cairo1
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1143



« Reply #37 on: November 12, 2004, 12:34:18 AM »

that is trew
Logged

"i see your ships, yes the cloaked ones too"
 
Lumpybob
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1718



« Reply #38 on: November 12, 2004, 04:26:36 AM »

but keep in mind that the warbird uses an artificial quantum singularity as a power source, a lot better than a matter/antimatter reaction chamber.a power source of that magnitude is needed to supply power to a ship
that is over twice the size of a galaxy class, so the disruptors got way more power than the enterprise d's sheilds could take. so they broke through in three shots
Logged

PREATOR DEFIANT
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4518



WWW
« Reply #39 on: November 12, 2004, 09:41:09 PM »

Do you have proof how much better it is then a standard anti-matter/matter power system? Also keep in mind our present power stations usually don't work over 35% efficiency.
Logged

*^*
Lumpybob
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1718



« Reply #40 on: November 13, 2004, 01:56:31 AM »

exactally, if at 50% efficiency, warbirds can kick the sh*t out of the entire fed fleet.
Logged

PREATOR DEFIANT
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4518



WWW
« Reply #41 on: November 13, 2004, 03:22:23 AM »

Uh then how did the Enterprise last so long against the Scimitar when the 2 Norexan classes were dropped fairly easily?
Logged

*^*
ewm90
Good old dyslexic
Donator
*
Online Online

Posts: 5463



WWW
« Reply #42 on: November 13, 2004, 04:51:43 PM »

thay pored wheaties breakfast cereal i the worp core. its caled the sotty munover.
Logged

Ask me what Landmark education can do for you.
Landmark Education: Seminars, Courses & Landmark Forum
PREATOR DEFIANT
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4518



WWW
« Reply #43 on: November 14, 2004, 08:36:12 AM »

Spammer...
Logged

*^*
Lumpybob
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1718



« Reply #44 on: November 16, 2004, 04:48:11 AM »

mmmmmmmm wheaties
well, pouring wheaties into the power core would blow the ship up
Logged

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

© 2003-2008 DOCa Cola. All rights reserved.
Star Trek and related marks are trademarks of Paramount Pictures.
Powered by Joomla
Powered by SMF 1.1.3 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com