Cmd.Paul
 Offline
Posts: 329
|
 |
« on: October 01, 2004, 03:44:24 PM » |
|
I've heard that they maybe wont make a new star trek movie because star trek in the US starts to be less and less popular :omg: :cry:
is this true?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 01, 2004, 04:26:30 PM by Cmd.Paul »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
coolhandab
Offline
Posts: 528
|
|
« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2004, 06:31:16 PM » |
|
Sounds likely. There's a pretty good following among trekkies for TNG reruns on cable, but the last decade of antenna TV has just been Voyager and that crap they call "Enterprise." So there aren't really any new fans.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Centurion, ready plasma torpedos. We shall show these meddling humans how the Star Empire conducts negotiations."
--nemo me impune lacessit
|
|
|
|
[F-I-I]VAdm-MJP
|
|
« Reply #2 on: October 01, 2004, 07:27:41 PM » |
|
hey enterprize is getting better...SLOWLY. lol
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ewm90
Good old dyslexic
Offline
Posts: 5473
|
|
« Reply #3 on: October 01, 2004, 11:30:11 PM » |
|
well it is trowe star trek in going dawn fast. not just enterprize but star trek. the threay is that be are just geting bord of the same thing over and over. thay have thot of all the ideas thare are to think of.
a idea at paramant is to supind star trek for 1 - 2 sesons wile doing movies and lots of advertinging to bring back intrest.
i and lot of old cast mimbers from the oreganl star trek think it shood be 2-4 yeres. its hapind be for with origanly star trek. thay supined it and than brot it back and it was populer agin.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Yaso Kuuhl
Offline
Posts: 119
|
|
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2004, 12:27:48 AM » |
|
That may be a good idea - let the concept rest for a few years and then try something new. And I mean NEW. No reused crew members, a new ship, a new setting timewise, hell, maybe an entirely new universe if it helps.
But I think nothing can save Star Trek right now, unless they get some other thinker like Roddenberry in there. If that story about J.M. Straczinky planning an own ST series were true, I'd be more optimistic. Right now, the ST stuff is pretty much in a dead end.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Some people are pragmatists, taking things as they come and making the best of the choices available.
Some people are idealists, standing for principle and refusing to compromise.
And some people just act on any whim that enters their heads.
I pragmatically turn my whims into principles.
|
|
|
RFO Cairo1
Offline
Posts: 1146
|
|
« Reply #5 on: October 02, 2004, 01:12:14 AM » |
|
most young americans dont like startrek why I do not know but it is true that it is still very big here untill this genaration dies out (oh that kinda made me sad  ). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"i see your ships, yes the cloaked ones too"  |
|
|
|
Optec
|
|
« Reply #6 on: October 02, 2004, 09:55:23 AM » |
|
well but Star Trek is one of the few topics which can adress people all over the world - besides starwars and lord of the rings  . Star Trek has a big community, and there are people who like Enterprise.. If Paramount would have decided to let Star Trek die they wouldn't work on their community so hard (new websites, getting a new Star Trek Game development running after the problems with Activision, a new series..) so i think there will be a new movie. I would guess that they already started writing it, cause a good movie would be exactly what Star Trek needs at the moment. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
-=B!G=-The Black Baron
Offline
Posts: 3042
|
|
« Reply #7 on: October 02, 2004, 11:09:17 AM » |
|
They need a damn good movie |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
*^* "My power is discombobulatingly devastating I could feel his muscle tissues collapse under my force. It's ludicrous these mortals even attempt to enter my realm."~Mike Tyson R.I.P. Legend  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ewm90
Good old dyslexic
Offline
Posts: 5473
|
|
« Reply #10 on: October 02, 2004, 03:45:26 PM » |
|
what i whood like to see is: star trek go in to time traval. thay will have to at some pont. make a big time jump with star trek to the entrpise R and that one will be a time ship.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cmd.Paul
Offline
Posts: 329
|
|
« Reply #12 on: October 02, 2004, 03:54:19 PM » |
|
all the evenly numbered movies are better than the others,
ie. first contact (6) rocks, generations (7) sucks
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cmd.Paul
Offline
Posts: 329
|
|
« Reply #14 on: October 02, 2004, 04:01:18 PM » |
|
well I think the theory actualy is correct, motion picture sucks, search for spock blegh, finally frontier yuck, generations (must be the worst star trek movie ever), insurrection (is ok) but that doesn't look good for the next movie indeed, perhaps time to break the tradition  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
