Star Trek Armada II: Fleet Operations

in one of his recent speeches, and i quote:



in the recent middle east election, i cant belive the people were so exited over an
erection*

(*ment as election)  


Your working hard to put food on your family




that is all i remember for now....

o bush duss not know english he speeks bush its like english but closer to ebonics.

some trlanlaters that mite help.

http://www.joel.net/EBONICS/translator.asp (http://www.joel.net/EBONICS/translator.asp)

http://www.atlantaga.com/redneck.htm (http://www.atlantaga.com/redneck.htm)

Apparently, Bush is not dumb.  He's BEYOND DUMB!  I can't believe that we have a total retard as our president.  Apparently, our country is full of retarded people.

the pepal how vote for bush are not dumn thay are unegicated. its a wast the placers that priomarly vote for bush have lowe IQs and pore scools. but thay are not dumn thay just dont have all  the facts on the most part.

and as for bush he is BEYOND DUMB. but the pepal teling him what to do are not you got the evagelicas reliler exstremists spetiol intrests and his advisers. and he seems to lison to tham all equlay its sad.

try this

Welcome to the forums, walkerboh.  That was KICK @$$!!  Apparently, Bush is trying to assimilate all people, American and non-American, into his collective which is one of stupidity, immaturity, and ignorance.  I'd rather be hunted down and have my carcass mutilated by the Jem'hadar than be assimilated by that idiot.

ya i love that picher i used to use it in my profile in the past. its a realy neet.



a nuther word bush has trubal with is "nukler" he needs to work on that one.

yeah so do you ...

Hey there!  Be nice to him.  Don't blame him for his use of spelling.  I suppose Bush didn't even graduate from kindergarten or grade school.  By the way, kindergarten is stupid and should be illegal because it encourages kids to be rude and mean to other kids especially later on in life.  For instance, kids make fun of other kids for not taking baths because kindergarten teachers treat the dirty kids like $#!@ (no pun intended).  If you don't want to take a bath, that's your right!  I suppose Bush must have had a lousy childhood being in Special ED.  Ha! Ha!  That explains why he didn't pass the first grade!!!  Ha!  Ha! :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  

-NieKnight
for that i cam gona call you a repulican!!!

well whop de do.

geting back on subject is scry haw a person how cant evin speek the local lagwig can become presadent its scary.

NATURAL GAS IS HEMISPHERIC. I LIKE TO CALL IT HEMISPHERIC IN NATURE BECAUSE IT IS A PRODUCT THAT WE CAN FIND IN OUR NEIGHBORHOODS."

I WOULD HAVE TO ASK THE QUESTIONER. I HAVEN'T HAD A CHANCE TO ASK THE QUESTIONERS THE QUESTION THEY'VE BEEN QUESTIONING.

THE GREAT THING ABOUT AMERICA IS EVERYBODY SHOULD VOTE

"THEY MISUNDERESTIMATED ME."

THEY WANT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CONTROLLING SOCIAL SECURITY LIKE IT'S SOME KIND OF FEDERAL PROGRAM."

"THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE ENOUGH PEOPLE IN THE SYSTEM TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF PEOPLE LIKE ME

"ACTUALLY, I...THIS MAY SOUND A LITTLE WEST TEXAN TO YOU, BUT I LIKE IT. WHEN I'M TALKING ABOUT...WHEN I'M TALKING ABOUT MYSELF, AND WHEN HE'S TALKING ABOUT MYSELF, ALL OF US ARE TALKING ABOUT ME."

Africa is a  nation with terrible disease.

I think we agree, the past is over.

It's clearly a budget, it gots alot of numbers in it.

"I WAS RAISED IN THE WEST. THE WEST OF TEXAS. IT'S PRETTY CLOSE TO CALIFORNIA. IN MORE WAYS THAN WASHINGTON, D.C., IS CLOSE TO CALIFORNIA."

I understand small business growth, I was one.

"IF YOU'RE SICK AND TIRED OF THE POLITICS OF CYNICISM AND POLLS AND PRINCIPLES, COME AND JOIN THIS CAMPAIGN."

HOW DO YOU KNOW IF YOU DON'T MEASURE IF YOU HAVE A SYSTEM THAT SIMPLY SUCKLES KIDS THROUGH?"

WE OUGHT TO MAKE THE PIE HIGHER."

"I THINK WE NEED NOT ONLY TO ELIMINATE THE TOLLBOOTH TO THE MIDDLE CLASS, I THINK WE SHOULD KNOCK DOWN THE TOLLBOOTH."

"THE MOST IMPORTANT JOB IS NOT TO BE GOVERNOR, OR FIRST LADY IN MY CASE."

"WILL THE HIGHWAYS ON THE INTERNET BECOME MORE FEW?"

"WE MUST ALL HEAR THE UNIVERSAL CALL TO LIKE YOUR NEIGHBOR JUST LIKE YOU LIKE TO BE LIKED YOURSELF."

"RARELY IS THE QUESTION ASKED: IS OUR CHILDREN LEARNING?"

"THE IMPORTANT QUESTION IS, HOW MANY HANDS HAVE I SHAKED?"

"I DON'T REMEMBER DEBATES. I DON'T THINK WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME DEBATING IT.. MAYBE WE DID, BUT I DON'T REMEMBER."

"THERE'S NO QUESTION THAT THE MINUTE I GOT ELECTED, THE STORM CLOUDS ON THE HORIZON WERE GETTING NEARLY DIRECTLY OVERHEAD."

"FOR EVERY FATAL SHOOTING, THERE WERE ROUGHLY THREE NON-FATAL SHOOTINGS. AND, FOLKS, THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE IN AMERICA. IT'S JUST UNACCEPTABLE. AND WE'RE GOING TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT."

"I'VE COINED NEW WORDS, LIKE, MISUNDERSTANDING AND HISPANICALLY."

"YOU TEACH A CHILD TO READ, AND HE OR HER WILL BE ABLE TO PASS A LITERACY TEST

IN MY SENTENCES I GO WHERE NO MAN HAS GONE BEFORE.

WE MUST ALL HEAR THE UNIVERSAL CALL TO LIKE YOUR NEIGHBOR JUST LIKE YOU LIKE TO BE LIKED YOURSELF.


these have all been said

that prity funny stuff thanks bob

Ironic, isn't it, that Bush was born in Connecticut, and he calls himself a Southerner?  Also, Texas is not part of the South anymore, huh.  It's more like its own country.  Here's what the South really consists of: nothing!  The Confederacy was wiped out by carpetbaggers who turned the South into the new home of the Republican party while the West and the North are now under the majority hand of the Democrats.

i did not know bush is from Connecticut? waw that realy make me think of him difratly he is one confusting S,O,B,

Simple.  You can think of him as a stupid CARPETBAGGER!  I hope he doesn't fudge up Social Security.  Ewm90, can you think of folks in the Republican party in Congress who would vote against his privatization of Social Security?

lmao :lol:  

i not sher i can probly find one or 2 what about mican whats his vow on it?

my bigest fear is that after 4 years jeb bush runs and wins and tan privites soshal sucraty sins hes the smarter bruther.

Talk about keeping it in the family.  I hope McCain clinches the Republican nomination and not Jeb.  I might even vote for McCain. ^_^  

o ya thares lots of insest in polatics o meen confution. but one of the reson the repulicans are so stong is be cuss thay made think tanks and grass rutes orgs in alot of stats. the dimacrats spind the monny on the lessfochint well thats not a lugshry we have eny more. the dimacrats are naw seting up grass rutes orgs in alot of red staates naw to make the week dimacratic infowins in that alot stonger.

if you live in a red stat and are a dimacrat and have extra time on you hand make a difrants jone a local grass rutes organation.

When the Democrats started taking up a more socialist stand on things, the Republicans took advantage of that by appealing to religious types, and this was back in the Cold War when Communism/Socialism, which leans towards secularism (often interpreted as Atheism).  With a little simple strategizing, the Republicans made the kill, and they now have majority control of Congress.  OMG
This is evident in the South.  However, states like Montana, which are traditionally red states, now lean towards Democrats.  Montana is run by Democrats in both the executive and legislative branches.  Max Baucus, a key senator from Montana, is a Democrat.  The governor of Kansas is a Democrat, as is the case in Wyoming.  North and South Dakota are represented mostly by Democrats in Congress.  The west coast is nowadays very liberal unless you live in Alaska (too cold, so no one really wants to live there and thus local folks are more conservative and not succeptable to liberal ideas, mostly).  Dems will always be around regardless what the beaver cleaver folks do.

obvisuly not thats the reason bush one, because he got the most vote so obvisuly hes licked the whole country over, or are all americans retarded and vote for the people they don't want to win?

its realy sad be cuss he will hert this contry and the warld. he was so much privit intrest in his polasys it scary. and he has mad more hard line repulicans. so it will be an up hill battal to stop him a battal we must win or evary one will loss.

yeah sure, i perosnaly think he has f***ed up a few times but he can do a lot of good, the people in iraq where being murderd by there own goverment just to enforce dictatorship and so what if the us and uk get oil as some spoils of war they still have to pay for it in three ways

1. you still have to pay even if it is dirt cheap
2. the cost to maintain defences all over the country (ie i am prette sure there is no oil in the middle of bagdad or in ticreat)
3. the cost to pay for the funerals of the dead service men and women the cost of the compenstation, the cost of wages,

american has'nt really got the much out of it and not only that they did the right thing, if the us ...  ... wait no when the us invades iran or serria i will proberly support that as well terrosim needs to be stopped and i will help i intend to join the royal air force and fight for and support my Queen and country and i suggest that the fat cunts in america go to fat camp and get in the army and help protect your family friends, and lively hood from the terroist threat! people keep blabling on about the lives lost in the iraq war big deal , think about the lives lost in terror attacks (ie 9/11 , the god dam IRA (who even touch us will have a full scale war on there hands give up your weapons, give the money back and back down to the monachy even your law says if you tend land for 40 years you own that land we tended it for over 400 ffs)) but anyway support your country and support you goverment you must learn the goverment does not back down to terror or left wing lonelys like yourself who do not see the potential danger to you and your lively hood by good dam terroist!

Wake up to the real world god dam you!

you have to remiber hes not doing it for amrica or iraq hes doing it for bush and dic channy.

dic channy runs a comapny caled haliberton wich has no big contracts in iraq the company is under investigation for fixing the books and shood be suspined from doing business in iraq but thare not. haliberton hass all so ben wonting to run a pip line thow irack to pump oil thow with sodam husane whood not let tham. holiberton pays bush and dic channy in big somes. and it you look at the iraq contitooshon its missing key elamints that protect a cuntry company corprit abuses. all so we for gave the ded ftom the us and ar not taking eny oil but if you look at the ded by comany its hug. comanys profit amrican paiy the price.

why do you think we have such a big det naw?

well you logic is flawed if bush is getting all this money even if he don't have the intell his advisors would do they would tell him to put some back in the us bank and another reason you are in debt is the same as the civalised world you gave god knows how many mills to the tsunami diaster remember over a few hundread mill (i know the uk people on its own with out the goveremtn gave more money then a few countrys on its own did in the first week (ie by the time the us had gave 18 mil we had gave 50 m) thats why the us and most the the civalised world is in debt because of charitey.

the reson bush gave some of his privit monny for the tsunami diaster if thats what your refering to is be cuss he hass so much of it he can aford to and he gets it back in tais rite off so its no problom for him and he looks good.

but what hes doing in the dack rawnd of that is the problom he gives rich pepal taxs cuts big taxs cuts. if he did not give out the taix cuts with the munny he cood get from the pepal how get the real bracks from tham the top 1% thare whood be a nuff to save soshal sucraty.

whay take munny from the pore and give it to the rich thats what he is doing with the taix cuts in amrica be cuss the tais cuts come from the soshal sucraty adminatration that he is naw saying is to pore to last hummm i wonder why?
and he naw wonts to privites it wich if you do the nubers and dont lison to bush will ashaly give the averige person 40% less monny for reiterment and thay still have not figer out hawto paiy for it or haw to make it work.

and you can look at all the pulooting bush is doing he pulled out out of the acorto acrords wich grate brinton and the rest of the world folow
but the us duss not you mite ask why. its be cuss some comany paiyed bush to not folowe it so thay can plute more.
meen wile on BBC thay sed a huge chunk of ice broke off the sath pole 3 miles wide and 5 miles long.  

sorry emw no offence but i could not understand that could you spell check it through plz.

basicly i was saying bush has so much coperit cruption in his partty its not evin funny. and its herting pepal alot. he give taix cuts out to the us pepal but it comes from ower retierment program cald soshal sucraty. naw he is saying soshaly sucraty is banck rupt and going to fail wich is not trow at all. and he has beter sytom but if you do the math the facts are is will give amricas 40% less munny for retier ment. cosing alot of old pepal how cant aford retierment to go homless.

and for the envierment he puled out of the acotoacoreds that are supost to reduss pulshion all arawnd the world. you mite askn whay he whood do this dumn thing be cuss comanys like haliberton exson and meny uther companys that pullt alot wonted to pullt more and gave him a bote loda of munny to let tham do so.

hes distroyed national parls, incressed loging, hes trying to drill oils from wiled life refuges and the list gose on and on.

ok i don't know much about these issues however the bottom one move the animals fossil fules are running out we need as much as we can get our grubby little hands on :P

but the oil in the anamal refuges will only last a cupal of years. when thare are uter places we cood get oil from. its sad that pepal wont to do this.

bush is all so making new nookler wepinds desipe the band the usa crated to reduss nookler wepinds. dont you think we have a nuff i meen realy thares onaly so meny times you can blow up the warld.

and you have  the documents to prove this emw90? have you managed to get hard evidence that bush is making womd? if so the whole world must converge on the us of a and invade, the whole world is waiting on your responce do you have 100% hard evidence that the usa is making womd's?

yep heres a britesh paper tocking about tham.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,898550,00.html (http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,898550,00.html)

and at this pont thare all redy under devlement i have seen pichers on tham on the us news.



AND ITS EWM90 NOT EMW90!!! lol

what is nookler wepinds . where ya from ewm90 .

washington dc i have dislexsea i am realy bad speller.

I was reading that article and it appears that we are the ones with WMDs.  How ironic, isn't it.  Bush is following the classical example of a slimeball who points blame on others for his own crimes or misdeeds.  What a pitty. :shifty:  

Nice little retarded thought there donald, had we not had our thousands of nukes then the Russians would have been all over us. If we don't have them now then the other 13 or so nuclear capable countries could threaten us, like russia did.

eWm90 wow a news paper has acess to top secert goverment meetings that must have some real good links, you must never trust the press they will always hype things up they proberly heard that gwb is planing on building a nuclear power plant and just conviently heard nuclear "hes making bombs he making bobs he said the n word!" the press will always throws the smallest of rumors out of control like the bbc did and still does, do you honestly think the guardian news paper would have heard about this befor the united nation or nato or the terroists did? come on really.

-NieKnight
i can aser you this one is real usa i can say for sher is bilding bucker busting nookler wepinds and posabul uther tipes two.


-PREATOR DEFIANT
the cold war is over but we are still bilding nukes. despite a trety we made to reduse nukler wepinds. rasha is realy mad over this one as well thay shood be.
bush has just ben puling out of treetys left and rite what kind of mesage duss that sint to ower alise?  

We still need them to keep the peace ewm...As I said before without them other countries could walk all over us. And of course it's not like were going to use them like saddam would have, I think your getting the point now.

if you reed the "the pentagons new map" by thomas barnett

it out lines the pentagons new thing for the fucher and in it, it says that thay are not woryed about eny of the big moder contreys germanys, franes, briton, indea, sweedin, spane, and so on from going to war eny more do to roles made affter WW2.

thare idea for the fucher is fiting littal contrays and makeing tham dimocrays like iran, sera, africin contrys, and alot of saweth amrican contrys.

so why do we need new nukes???

Theoricly, the WHOLE world has enough nucluer power (The USA formost) to destroy the world 10 times with the weapons currently avaible.

I'll make a note that I'm Canadian and I don't know how much Bush effects you guys in the States but I feel for you. In the debates, man, he is a retard.

-USS Legacy
only 10 times triy more like 1000 times. us alown has a nuff to blow up the wald like 500 times.

lol most pepal in my contry are to woryed about offineding some you say some thing like bush is a retard most pepal realy what to know the person here well be for we say that amrica is so devided.

The only problem we have up here in Canada is a big spending Prime Minister. (Sponsership Scandel)

So much for world harmony...

i am thinking of moving to canida the only problom the dolor is so week i whood probly loos munny going up thare and i whood need a job and on on  but i have thot of it.

I hear Techical Expertise is in great demand up here in British Columbia.

achaly i have a frind in BC hmmm more atrative evry day its hard to find a job here.

I have friends all over the providce, what his/her name?

sean p  i wont give his full name out of a forum. hes in vancover

Okay, hmm, haven't heard that name.

Theres a huge media centre being built I think in Tronoto (I think its being built there). Lots of new job might be found there.

hmmm intresting. i need to finesh up my web advised web desine certifacit ferst.

I think its called Meteron Canada. Artists from all over will be coming there, of course they still have to build it.

The gas price here is high though .80-.85 cents a liter, and thats tough.

ya thats an inowe.

wecome to work we dont have a desk yet....... or a office but heres a nise clump of dert to work on. and an unbrula in case it raines.

The health system really need employees here in canada but I don't know the pay.

well i sher it can be nugoshated.

Last I heard we have enough nuclear weapons to destroy the world like 13 times. I don't see why ewm is bitching because unless someone else uses theirs, we won't use ours, thats how the whole thing works...

but why do meny why 13 times do realy realy need that meny?

but bush is evin bilding more and you cant see what i am "bitching"?

its incradabul to me that pepal feel that insucer. if we got rid of more most of tham well wood still be abul to blow up the hole planite 2 just times.

There's so much bias about how we are the good guys.  Well, that's horsecrap!

hey donald1

we are the good giys, we are just miss led. the hole reson pepal folw bush is in thare minds thay think what bush is doing is good.
its reay sad to wach usa be terned in to what its becoming. we need to get back to the valuse of the 4 fother. bush is not real amrica bush is a distortion of the troth.  

The reason we have so many nukes is really just number, how it looks on paper, it's like 2,600 and thats a big number on paper, no one cares how many nukes you got except you have more then the other guy, thats it. Makes sense don't it?

no not real. i meen at the pont that you can blow up the warld and still haveing nooke left its just exses, it take munny to keep all those nooks sucer, working, and stored. i think  munny cude be beter spint uther places.


 the cold war is over we had all to nukes to stop rasha and uther comunist contrys from nooking us well those days are over.
the problom we face naw is smaller contrys and tarist groops that will whood take 3-4 nooks to wipe out. so all thos thousonds of nooks are not needed. about 50-100 whood do the job.

and and we dont have a nuff nookler loch sites to loch tham all be for we are distoyed so it just make sints, uthers contrys think we are scard of tham. wich from what i get from waching bush not what he wonts to relay.

but no we are making more and more why?

Becasue your a moron ewm, jesus christ you take everything that are government does as an insult to the world. We have that many nukes so we can respond in differant ways, such as nuclear bombs, cruise missiles, ICBMs, etc. That way we can have enough nukes in each catagory so that if an enemy somehow wiped one out, we have a backup plan.

I don't think we need that many either but their there, we can either use them to make another chernobyl or we can make em into a hiroshima, and apparently our elected leaders decided for the latter. Don't ask me why they do it, i'm not your enemy here.

as an insult no no. i dont i just think that bush is miss leding this cunnty.

but we dont need tham all thare bo tret on us to justify all thos nukes.
but bush is braking treetys and that keept ower ailes from geting nukes.

the treety bush brokle to make the new nuke weponds was disined to reduse the amont of nukes that rusha had and keep tham happy.

the word is more un safe if pepal think like that the more nukes pepal have the biger the chace of some one useing or selling one.

I think a lot of it has to do with expected reliability. The Russians for instance have a few hundred Topol and Topol-M missiles that are practically brand new, and they know they'll work. The average age for our arsenal is over 20 years, with a design life of 15. We'd have to fire at least three warheads at every target to make sure of detonation. Remember the test ban 15 years ago? We have that to thank for this.

Actually there is some speculation (this info is classified of course so I don't really know) that out of every 6 ICBMs we could launch only one would actually make it out of the silo, track correctly, release correctly, and have all three warheads hit the right targets and detonate.

but haw meny torgets to we have left. have all the nukes arawnd is more of a insintive for uther contry to get nukes tham selves. apeshaly contrys that we are not frindly with. thay think the same whay we do the more nookes we have the biger inserents poasy. but what hapinds if the contrry gose in to sival ware or clapses with all those nukler wepinds.

after the claps of the ussr you have nukes that rusha cude not take care of that wher just siting a rawnd in some case with lital or no sucraty in farers feelds. so naw that tyhe us has declared war on all contrrys that harber tarist those cuttry will wont nukes be cuss thay think we mite lonch owers at tham.


in my mind i can not make a argument that cood posibaly just ify all the nucler wepinds we have its mad ness.

In my opinion the countrys that have like 1 or so nukes are by far more dangerous than USA or Russia that have a lot of them, because they feel real powerful with that one nuke, and if someone had attacked them or something they wouldnt hasitate to launch it :-S

About the number of the nukes US have, the thing is it is also hard to get rid of them, since it takes a lot of time to dismantle it and that they become unhazardes fot the enviroment.

but we are bilding more not geting rid of tham.

Precisely. Although the more important aspect is the whole world knows that if a nuclear power is attacked by someone with a return address, it's their last day on earth. What's scarier to me as a US citizen is someone like Iran or N. Korea giving a nuke to a group of people who effectively operate independently; it would be much more difficult to craft a politically acceptable retaliation for such an action.  

True, terrorists cant hope to match the millitarry power of the big nations like USA, GB, France, Germany, Russia,.... so they use guerilla tactics, and I realize its hard to predict or stop these terrorists.
But I dont agree USA just attacking countrys that supposably support terrorosts, I think that under-cover operations, with a small group or specialists would not only cause less suffering to innocent people, but would also be more effective. At least I think so :)

We did the covert ops thingy in Afghanistan and it worked fairly effectively expect for one thing, Osama got away. With thousands of ground troops we are able to secure more faster and to my knowledge, we've gotten saddam and his sons, and pretty much everyone responsible for the killing of the Iraqis, either dead or alive. I think thats what made the differance, and that there was alot more enemy soldiers involved, more technicals and armor, etc.

Bout the nukes, you trust a country that hasen't launched a nuke into another country...ever, or do you trust a country whos getting a nuke for the first time and has sworn enemies all around and isn't afraid to lose millions to achieve their goal?

Well u cant say u didnt ever launched a nuke, if I remember correctly u launched 2 against Japan in WW2, but that is different I guess since lots of souldiers died from Japanieses reluctance to end eventhough they couldnt win anymore :)

Those were not nukes, those were atom bombs, 2 differant things. They also weren't missiles, as I implied when I said launched, but simply dropped from 2 B-29 superfortresses.

you need a history leson it seems adom bomns and nukler boms are the same think thay both split adoms cosing devistating resolts.

so meny pepal died in japne be cuss of us droping nukes on tham. kiling milinons of inasent pepal man woman and childran. it is  nuthing to be spokin of litly the pepal hoe lived ahfter we nuked japane in herashema and nonasoky wher cripaled and doomed to die a most haribal deth. we are the only cuntry to ever use the bomn on himains and i hope it stays that whay.

those wepinds shood be wiped from the face of the earth.

Oh oh ho, you need the history lesson here SON. Atom bomb and Nuclear bomb are differant. Simple answer, an atom bomb splits the atoms while the other deals with nuclei. Atom bombs are much less destructive and are the for runner of nuclear weapons. In reality there are no differance between the 2 but there was when we were chatting here.

Well ewm the differance is that well your a moron and i'm not, let me explain.

2 B-29s bomb 2 japanese cities with nuclear weaponry and kill 180,000 people, mostly innocent civilians. War comes to quick end with no more US soldiers killed.

We don't bomb Japan, civilians spared, we launch a huge ass amphibious assault against Japan, an estimated million US soldiers are killed in fighting, as well as an estimated 5 million Japanese, soldiers and civilians but mostly armed civilians forced to fight.

Hmm, I fail to see your view of how this could have been resolved without more bloodshed.

 

- PREATOR DEFIANT
i think you shood read this: http://www2b.abc.net.au/science/k2/stn/arc...opic145966.shtm (http://www2b.abc.net.au/science/k2/stn/archives/archive24/newposts/145/topic145966.shtm)

and maby 180,000 wher kiled in the anishal expotion but thowsin and thowinds died after wherds.

knowing what we know to day about the bomb i whood never have droped it. at that time we did not know haw pawer full it was. it shaoked the pepal how made it and all of world to learned what had hapind.

we all most dproed it on a 3ed torget to thank god with did not.

Well you are indeed a moron, had we not dropped them millions more of innocent civilians would have died...then a million million service men...

Let's not get into a heated arguement okay? Remember what this topic was created for...

EDIT:

The past is the past and arguing about  won't help change it at all.

But I mean jesus...everyone says many millions of lives were saved by the bombs and hes still rambling about the destruction they caused, not prevented.

You know the old expression:

"Too good to be true..."

Well, thats the way war is, sure, many people were free and some disaster averted but, of course, it came at a price. Many deaths.

But PREATOR DEFIANT has a point. Without those bombs launched what would of been the intial future? More death caused by a continous war?

Chances are yes, there was a 95% chance of more war because of the japanese klingon-ness when it comes to honor. Once they saw that they would die meaningless deaths and not even kill their enemy, they decided to give up.

Technically Praetor the Emperor was convinced to order his people to cease hostilities when he saw what we did to Nagasaki. The first bomb didn't even impress them too much, they thought it was a one-shot or an act of God or something. We were indeed fortunate that Nagasaki's destruction ended the war, because of course we were all out of bombs : )

Careful about saying they weren't nukes by the way, they were fission devices, commonly called nukes, but they weren't THERMOnukes, which is what you're trying to say I think.

Also, ewm, we killed 300,000 mostly innocent civilians in March 1945 in Tokyo with firebombs. Tell me how the two nukes were so inhumane?

We killed like 200,000 people in dresden during a firebombing, more then what were killed in the first day of the hiroshima and nagasaki bombings combined.

Nuclear weapons are essentially all the same expect the device you used to detonate it, and how much radioactive material is used, I don't see why saying a nuke is just a differant kind of a nuke is so important...

And the 2 atom bombs did their job of ending the war, thats undesputible.

There where 2 more unsued bombs created at the time, besides Fat man and Little Boy, now will eveyone just drop it and get back to the topic.


 I want justice.  There's an old poster out west, as I recall, that said, "Wanted: Dead or Alive.", Thats one fo my favourite bush quotes.

Fair enough about returning to topic. But we really were out ... another plutonium implosion device like Fat Man went operational some 4 months after cessation of hostilities, around the New Year I believe.

- PREATOR DEFIANT
all i am gona say is i think you rong but i respect your opinon.

- cts006 - coolhandab - USS Legacy
you are all rite we need to get back on topic.




did you here the haribal news bush is naw finaly feeling the heet from the defacit and his inrspoabulty with the us trashary.
and is naw cuting soshal programs and uther inporton funnding programs.

i dont remiber tham all but what i do remiber is:

he cuting the fundying for amtrak wich with out funding will go brackrupt and leev us with out a pasiger tranes sitom in amrica.

hes naw calasling hubal telisope wich is still finding this and is a huge resore and will be a grate lose to the sintifac comnity.

hes cuting funndying for litarsy programes well if your pore and have dislexsa i gess your scroowed.

and anuber of uther programs this is unexspetibal to me. hes all so useing the munny to increes awer miltary.

when will amrica whake up and stand up for its fucher?

I'm starting to think Kerry would run the contry better. Bush is from Texas and is use to roughing it, but no one else is. Why can't he just take other peoples feelings into concideration?

Because if every president did what the population wanted and not what was actually right, then we would all be speaking german or russian.

Like I said, Kerry might run the contry better, but not perfectly.

Strange that I'm even disscusing this. I'm Canadian.

Yes quite strange, you either cut spending on pretty much everything, or you raise taxes a whole bunch to fix the deficit, bush chose to cut spending. I think Kerry would have done the other but again, we still lose, and I think more so. Whoever is in the white house is not going to do things everyone likes, so for now we will just have to live with this system of government.

So its a no win-no win situation.

Sure

I think not.  Texas can kiss my redneck/yankee @$$.  Just because things are rough in Texas doesn't mean that they have to be rough elsewhere.  Look at New England.  They had their first execution in 25 years, which means they have a different way of life that apparently has worked.  West Virginians seem to have some things made with top public schools, good roads, and some sense of stability without having to execute every other person who commits some d@mned crime.  People in California apparently believe in reasonable resolves most of the time.  Just because Texas is screwed up doesn't mean that we have to privatize something that can't work being privatized (believe me, our country has socialist beginnings when you consider mail service and public schools) and that we have to abbliterate treaties and allies.  I live in Pennsylvania, which is screwed up by itself, but I believe in reasonable resolves, not cowboy stupidity, and Bush comes from a New England family that is totally yankee by origin and nature!!! :mad:

To make a topic about making fun of how a president screws up speechs sometimes seems pretty retarded to me. Hell I screw up talking all the time because I lack confidence, that and I think I have a speech impediment.

- PREATOR DEFIANT
but for ower presadent to not be abul to give a speech well is prity funny. preesadent or supost to be snoby very class think very carfly about what thay say and to be hard workers wich bush is nun of this. thats why its funny.



if this is trow why has he never stoped one spinding bill ever hes not cuting spinding he is spinding to the max. but karry came from a back rawnd of hard work and taking ponts that pepal dont like to tolk about that need to be tocked about and tocking about tham.

karry had a plane to fixs do what bush is tring to do by 2009 and doing tham by 2008 with out cuting eny of the soshal programs and inproving the job sichation. geting rid of a lot of that corpit greed from the white house. and with out have not think of reforing sochal sucraty.

as USS Legacy sad he mite not be perfict but he is so much beter than what we are stuck with naw. bush made his bed naw he must sleep in it.


the uther progames he cut wher

enviermital programes

housing programes for pore pepal

and food programs for pore pepal

----the uther ones i posted wher----

amtrak

hubal telisope to be scraped

litrasy programe



its cleer this presadent duss not give a rates ass about the pore or envirement.





and the fact remands that he is still spinding like we have a serpuls so he probly wont fixs the det a lot. and end up haveing to cut medicare funndying and soshal sucraty funndying after a wile.

Well ewm due to your bitching about the deficit, now your going to get your wish and it will lessen, at the cost of these programs. So you can stop now, it's either get deficit, get taxes, or less programs.  

Actually government schools were a creation of FDR, and have been something of an unmitigated disaster (compare literacy levels now versus 100 years ago). Fortunately while being far less educated we are all a lot richer due to the miracles of free enterprise, so I guess that's something.

Re. Texas being so screwed up, sure they have a different culture that may seem alien to those of the Left Coast or New England, but their violent crime rates (murder, rape, agg. assault) are much, much lower. Gee I wonder why?

well if you just revers the taix cuts for the rich it whood do the same thing of cansling all the nesary programe. with OUT RASING TAXES.

True.  I believe that the way to save Social Security without raising taxes or privatizing it would be to close all loopholes dipping into that particular fund and divert funds from one most unlikely source - government payroll.  What I mean by government payroll is the pay of those who are either elected or appointed into office.  I also believe that the tax cuts need to be rescinded.  The other choices would have to be diverting funds from elsewhere or a TEMPORARY tax increase for Social Security by .5% that would be rescinded automatically by law when the Social Security budget is either balanced or surplused.

I think we should take over mexico and use them as cheap labor. Oh wait, thats my bad side talking :blush:  

wht not canida i sher USS Legacy whood love to be cheep laber. j/k

but serisaly this presadent is herting this contry deeply. its time for a chage.

I wouldn't mind taking over quebec.

But seriously, I think we should take over quebec.

you hate tham frich pepal alot preter. its not frinch friy its freedom friy.

French have really lost my respect, and alot of peoples here in the US. They will pay in due time.

well i am disharted to see you post that the frich pepal are good pepal how care alot about the envierment and about africa.
the germands at one pont wher teamed up with the frinch in thare anger tored amarica along with rusha. alot of pepal can simpathise with the friich feeling tord the usa we have not ben the easy contry to be ailse with latly.

I hear Quebec wants to become a seperate contry but, they can't, they rely on the funding from the federal government and other supplies such as lumber from BC. Besides, its not like we, (Canada and the States) can just cast away the french. Thats just not right. The french are a good people and I hate seeing them put through this whole thing of disrepect. Just because certain French offended some US citizens, doesn't mean that all French are like that.

Have quebec we dont want it, all we want is the maple syrup.

Ya, I just said that.

two bad pepal dont paiy bush tuns of munny two do things right.

Hes probely sucked all the money out people anyway...

bush whood make a good prosta toot its all most like thats what he was deined to do i think he misted his calling.

When will Bush's term be up?

good quechon 2008, ech us presadent serves 4 yere terms ech presadent can only serve 2 terms this is bushs 2ed term.

What made everyone elect him in the first place?

a ot of difrant things he is a hard liner and alot of america voted more him in grater nubers after 911 be cuss he was perseved to be beter on sucraty.

he is all so verey religos and alot of america is religose and like that about him.

he all so from what i see seemed to relate to evry day pepal more be cuss he makes mustakes and is hed strong.

and meny uther resons.

guys, please keep this to bush quotes and put this other political talk where it belongs.

- cts006
you rite sary eny repliys to things above i amk be moved to the political thred thanks.

I have a Bush quote.  This is from the second debate (the one in Missouri), and it was a response to a question from someone concerning Canadian drugs (note: this is a paraphrase of what I remember, so these are not his exact words):

"We're not making Canadian drugs illegal.  We're just making sure that they're safe."
 

what happened to bush quotes?

aint this kind of discussion for the "political thread part 2"?

well this tred it seemed to be about a bush quotes only. i did not relise it was a full political thred.

this was supposed to be bush quotes only[/size]
 

bush caled lebanon lebabanon.  grate job bush. i gess we thot he was in a rap vido,

Wow, a topic dedicated to someone not being able to talk quite right. I should make a topic dedicated to how ewm spells, HAHAHA, caled? IT'S CALLED. LOL VIDO! DON'T GET ME STARTED ON THOT!

ya well i dont run the cunntry bush duss, and he cant speek properly.

Well you can't type properly...thats pretty hipicritical of you ewm.

DEFIANT, he didn't choose to be that way, settle down.  

And president bush didn't choose to have a slight speech impediment, don't tell me my freakin business legacy.

i was about to say the same, ewm you would kick up a stink if a dislexic president got in and people started to take the piss.

Damn it!  He happens to have dyslexia which can be a burden.  I'm not trying to make him special.  I can tell you that because I have at least one mental illness; I'm just trying to help you realise that he can't help it, so STOP BEING LIKE JIM DEMINT, A NO-GOOD BIGOT WHO'S VIEWS OF CERTAIN PEOPLE ARE AN ABOMINATION!!!  Whatever happened to caring for crying out loud!

- NieKnight
i dont wont to be presadent i just wont to have a good one. pepal how run for presadent or priminaster wont to be in the spot lite.
the realy smart one knows its not only what you do in life thats in portent but have you live life that is inportent. you dont have to be a presadent or priminister to make a difrants it helps tho lol.

i may not be rite for presadent. but i think a dislexsic whood make a good presadent i bet if you looking it use a few of ower presadent have ben dislexsics. not all dislexsic have as hard a time with reedinf and rigting as i do.

the thing about dislexsic we are used to playing the under dog and haveing tuff brakes. that makes us stronger dislexsics have a whay of tering disabulaty in to abilaty. same thing as a blind man when ginin time some times can see things beter than a person with perfict vistion.

- PREATOR DEFIANT
its asmasing to me we have apresadent that can say things like.

let woman exspreisne thare love your thare O,B,G,Y,N,s and still be elected presadent.

- donald1
dont wory about tham thare just tring to get off sub ject i dont blam tham its not fun to here haw your party has made a big mustake and he is your hope for the fucher just be pationt with tham.

my party? i'm english remember, i just think its funney how you are slandering a guy becuase he does not have a way with words, when you can't even spell 90% of them, its not his fault and that is not your fault, big deal so the guy has ambition and a goal in life, atleast hes reached it. I personaly think you would be kicking up a right stink if we where taking the piss out of a idslexic president, you kind of remind me of a black person, your happy to slander a white person but if you slander a black person "its coz i'm black ain't it?"

Well see ewm, you act like hes the only one who doesn't have perfect speech, and sense hes the president, he has to be perfect and be flawless. Whats funny is you, certainly not flawless, is making fun of the president. If you want to keep making fun of him, I make fun of you, that simple.

don't as that will just be a flame war again, if you are going to make fun of him BOTH OF YOU DO IT VIA PM.

He just needs to remember no ones perfect, presidents included.

- NieKnight

about dislexsea you are geting out line thare you have no idea about haw dislexsa works. so please spare me the sermins on haw i shood or shood not be. when you start tocking about pepals folts thats geting close to flaming agin you seem to be geting quite close to it agin.

i dont under stand what you are staying your all over the place what do black pepal have to do with eny thing?

and yes i know you are britesh and tony blair is your leeder. but some times i feel that tony blair and bush make some of the same mistake together. aspeshaly regardy arock and taisom.

- PREATOR DEFIANT

hes the leder of the staongest contry on erth every lital thing he says has big plitical ramifications. so win a presadent can not speel well it duss more damage than just making him look silly.

-------------------

lets continue this in thepiolical thed this ones is off topic.

Well if you think he shouldn't be allowed to be president because of how he talks, I don't think you should be allowed to be on these forums because you can't type.

thats not what i am saying.
 i am saying i am serpised haw a us presadent how cant speek rite can be elecleted for his 2ed term.

the american pepal are not aming very hiy.

we shood conenowe thin in the politacal tred...

Your not understanding me, someones speech ability has almost nothing to do with their intelligence, but your saying it does, and thats retarded.

well sorta.
what i am saying if a presadent knows he has this problom why whood he run for presadent. that shood be a sine that he mite not be cutty out for the job.

He ran for president then same reason you joined these forums, because he feels hes able to perform his job, same as why your still here, you don't think your dislexia keeps you from posting.  

he had had lital experison in real polatics the last exspreisn he had was runing texis in to the grawnd. he know he had an acihall problom and sufered from depreson. he was prity much kicked out of the nashanal gard for not opabing orders. he has a problom with athority.

if he had probloms that he was strugaling to controle, how can he think he can help the stronbgest nation on earth controle thares?

this is not about me is about bush.

Oh no ewm, you think hes not fit for the job, but in reality you've said that all along. The differance now is your saying hes not fit because of how he talks. I'm simply showing you everyone has problems, you have a typing problem. If you don't want him to be president because of how he talks, then I don't want you in these forums because of how you type, that is a fair deal I think.

most of the probloms has he needs to deel with be for runing milinons of pepals lives


my dislexsea has nuthing to do with this please stop bring it up. this is about the presadent not me.

You need to stop raggin on the president for his speech problems, especially if you got your own problems everyone else can see. Thats all i'm saying.

yes but i am not runing the contty he is.

Ok you still don't get it, WE ALL HAVE PROBLEMS, HIS DOES NOT AFFECT HIS INTELLIGENCE ON HIS JOB, YOURES DOES NOT AFFECT YOUR INTELLIEGENCE ON THESE FORUMS. To say that hes less intelligent because of how he talks is idiocy.

no but like i sed be for evry time he says some thing rong it has politacl ramifactions.

haw do we know one day he mite make a mistake and say some thing like.

troops or movin in to iran. when he meends flusha in iraq. and that iran starts preparing for war.

or if he says we shood stop gay pepal. whaen he ment to say we sood stop gay marige.

i meen its can be a realy problom if he says the rong thing.

No, your were talking about the way he talks, not if he says the wrong things. He has all of his speeches prepared for him and the chances of him making mistakes like that are fairly rare, and he corrects them right after when he does. I saw him make a mistake on the daily show, but he corrected later, it means nothing.

No ones gonna have their finger on the button just waiting for him to say hes gonna invade iran anyway.

it just takes one miss stake and we will have real probloms. and all this miss takes make it harder for uther cuntrys to take the us sreisly. thare is not ally alot of anit us felling out thare naw thares all so alot of anti bush feeling out thare.

So your saying the way the president talks can now cause problems for national security?

it cood enry leter the presadent says is anilised by ower aliys and enmys.

if it was a dimacrat how tolked like bush. the repulican whood be calling for his hed thtas a fact. look what hapined to clinton that made a mistake.

What are you talking about, I didn't really understand much of your last post.

sary bad spelling what i was saying sumbed up is: enry thing a presadent says is cafaly wached and thot about evry word evry leter.

mistakes can be dedly to a politacl job a spashaly presaden look what hapind to clinton.

Of course mistakes can be deadly, but he always corrects them, which is less then what I can say about your proofreading.

but like with clinton crecting tham did not slove the problom. some times pepal are looking for an exsuce to do some thing.

lets say bush says a nuther mistake about the crodase and and ben ladin uses it to recute more tarists as he probly did with the ferst misstake.

ewm if you had the slighest intelligence and atchaly red what i said you would understand.

i am not going to respond to that.

umm, you just did?

Yeah bin laden will be able to recruit people off of someone making a mistake and correcting it immediatly afterwards, that makes perfect sense.

blin ladin recroots pepal basted off of binding facts. the idea is to give him as lital amunition as posabal.

No he gets recruits off of lieing, because he can easily control al jazeera to say what e wants it to say. That and we end up bombing a new arabic country every weekend for one country or another.

well i havent been around for a while, but let me ask this question: Is it fair for mega-corperations stomipng on little ones to increase their profit margin.

Of course not, but then again most people wouldn't support this. Whats sad is thats big business, that is capitalism. My advice is to get a good product and make sure competition doesn't get ahead.

If thats another dis bush thing, it doesn't really matter. It's not wrong to support big companies to get money for your campaign, as long as they don't kill people.

i perfer to support small bussiness. small biness crates most of the jobs in america. big biness most off it is crupt and to rich and most companys will not hasitate to step on some one if thay get in thare whay.


 

Can't really argue with that...

Who could? Well i'm sure ewm can find something...ewm got anything?

jon mican how is a repulican and i am thing of voting for wors hard to keep coprit cruption out of platics.

comany have no bissnes in poaltics in thay whay thay are to day.

So in other words. You won't support them for reasons other then them killing people?

i am a lital confused about the killing part how whood kill how and why?


on a side not i just saw a good movie about the russhin vehinom in eginlesh in afganistand. it was caled "the beast". it kinda made the war real to me so i cood see the whay it kinda worked and about the talibands behaver of that time it was about a rushion tank crow, it was in inertanment i give it 3 stars out of 5.

It woulda sucked to be a russian in afghanistan in the 80's, you get american guns shot at you.

this aint george bush quotes any more, is it?

apperently, this has become another "political thread pt II"

Perhaps this thread should be closed since it is beyond repair.

i agree, it stated off as quotes, which then moved on to an arugment, is this forum incapeable of staying on topic?

It's a retarded topic that deserves to die.

If only it were so easy to go

Thread Closed

Don't see that too much any more....

Jeez I got excited USS Legacy, thought you were a mod now. Don't fake us out like that!  :lol:  

yes, it must die...got too far off topic

Not so much that cept it has a stupid concept to it.

hey, i thinkk bush is a dumbass, and he says lots of stoopid s**t,

so i made a topic 4 all the stoopid crap he says, (well....at last i tried)

Well you say alot of stupid sh*t, so does ewm, I think if you want to keep this thread going you should make one about yourself.

Ahh! Isn't this topic suppost to be buried and dead? DEFIANT has a point anyway, and you can just post funny junk about bush in the Political thread anyway.

(http://ai.pricegrabber.com/muze_images/books/5/22/0743262522_150x150.jpg) (http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/graphics/image_bushisms_small.jpg) (http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/graphics/image_morebushisms_small.jpg) (http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/graphics/image_stillmorebushisms_small.jpg)

"In this job you've got a lot on your plate on a regular basis; you don't have much time to sit around and wander, lonely, in the Oval Office, kind of asking different portraits, 'How do you think my standing will be?'" —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., March 16, 2005

"In terms of timetables, as quickly as possible — whatever that means." —George W. Bush, on his time frame for shoring up Social Security, Washington D.C., March 16, 2005

"I repeat, personal accounts do not permanently fix the solution." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., March 16, 2005

"This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply ridiculous. And having said that, all options are on the table." —George W. Bush, Brussels, Belgium, Feb. 22, 2005

"If you're a younger person, you ought to be asking members of Congress and the United States Senate and the president what you intend to do about it. If you see a train wreck coming, you ought to be saying, what are you going to do about it, Mr. Congressman, or Madam Congressman?" —George W. Bush, Detroit, Mich., Feb. 8, 2005

"Because the — all which is on the table begins to address the big cost drivers. For example, how benefits are calculate, for example, is on the table; whether or not benefits rise based upon wage increases or price increases. There's a series of parts of the formula that are being considered. And when you couple that, those different cost drivers, affecting those — changing those with personal accounts, the idea is to get what has been promised more likely to be — or closer delivered to what has been promised. Does that make any sense to you? It's kind of muddled. Look, there's a series of things that cause the — like, for example, benefits are calculated based upon the increase of wages, as opposed to the increase of prices. Some have suggested that we calculate — the benefits will rise based upon inflation, as opposed to wage increases. There is a reform that would help solve the red if that were put into effect. In other words, how fast benefits grow, how fast the promised benefits grow, if those — if that growth is affected, it will help on the red." —George W. Bush, explaining his plan to save Social Security, Tampa, Fla., Feb. 4, 2005

"You work three jobs?  … Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic that you're doing that." —George W. Bush, to a divorced mother of three, Omaha, Nebraska, Feb. 4, 2005

"After all, Europe is America's closest ally." —George W. Bush, Mainz, Germany, Feb. 23, 2005

"I'm also mindful that man should never try to put words in God's mouth. I mean, we should never ascribe natural disasters or anything else to God. We are in no way, shape, or form should a human being, play God." —George W. Bush, ABC's 20/20, Washington D.C., Jan. 14, 2005

"I want to appreciate those of you who wear our nation's uniform for your sacrifice." —George W. Bush, Jacksonville, Fla., Jan. 14, 2005

"I speak plainly sometimes, but you've got to be mindful of the consequences of the words. So put that down. I don't know if you'd call that a confession, a regret, something." —George W. Bush, speaking to reporters, Washington, D.C., Jan. 14, 2005

"Who could have possibly envisioned an erection — an election in Iraq at this point in history?" —George W. Bush, at the white House, Washington, D.C., Jan. 10, 2005

"We need to apply 21st-century information technology to the health care field. We need to have our medical records put on the I.T." —George W. Bush, Collinsville, Ill., Jan. 5, 2005

"I believe we are called to do the hard work to make our communities and quality of life a better place." —George W. Bush, Collinsville, Ill., Jan. 5, 2005

"It's a time of sorrow and sadness when we lose a loss of life." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Dec. 21, 2004

"They can get in line like those who have been here legally and have been working to become a citizenship in a legal manner." —George W. Bush, on immigrant workers, Washington, D.C., Dec. 20, 2004

"And so during these holiday seasons, we thank our blessings." —George W. Bush, Fort Belvoir, Va., Dec. 10, 2004

"Justice ought to be fair." —George W. Bush, speaking at the White House Economic Conference, Washington, D.C., Dec. 15, 2004

"The president and I also reaffirmed our determination to fight terror, to bring drug trafficking to bear, to bring justice to those who pollute our youth." —George W. Bush, speaking with Chilean President Ricardo Lagos, Santiago, Chile, Nov. 21, 2004

"We thought we were protected forever from trade policy or terrorist attacks because oceans protected us." —George W. Bush, speaking to business leaders at APEC Summit, Santiago, Chile, Nov. 20, 2004

"I always jest to people, the Oval Office is the kind of place where people stand outside, they're getting ready to come in and tell me what for, and they walk in and get overwhelmed in the atmosphere, and they say, man, you're looking pretty." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Nov. 4, 2004

"After standing on the stage, after the debates, I made it very plain, we will not have an all-volunteer army. And yet, this week — we will have an all-volunteer army!" —George W. Bush, Daytona Beach, Fla., Oct. 16, 2004 (Watch video)

"I hear there's rumors on the Internets that we're going to have a draft." —George W. Bush, second presidential debate, St. Louis, Mo., Oct. 8, 2004 (Watch video)

"The truth of that matter is, if you listen carefully, Saddam would still be in power if he were the president of the United States, and the world would be a lot better off." —George W. Bush, second presidential debate, St. Louis, Mo., Oct. 8, 2004

"When a drug comes in from Canada, I wanna make sure it cures ya, not kill ya... I've got an obligation to make sure our government does everything we can to protect you. And one — my worry is that it looks like it's from Canada, and it might be from a third world." —George W. Bush, second presidential debate, St. Louis, Mo., Oct. 8, 2004

"We all thought there was weapons there, Robin. My opponent thought there was weapons there." —George W. Bush, second presidential debate, St. Louis, Mo., Oct. 8, 2004

"Let me see where to start here. First, the National Journal named Senator Kennedy the most liberal senator of all." —George W. Bush, referring to Sen. Kerry, second presidential debate, St. Louis, Mo., Oct. 8, 2004

"I own a timber company? That's news to me. Need some wood?" —George W. Bush, second presidential debate, St. Louis, Mo., Oct. 8, 2004

"Another example would be the Dred Scott case, which is where judges, years ago, said that the Constitution allowed slavery because of personal property rights. That's a personal opinion. That's not what the constitution says. The constitution of the United States says we're all — you know, it doesn't say that. It doesn't speak to the equality of America." —George W. Bush, second presidential debate, St. Louis, Mo., Oct. 8, 2004

"The enemy understands a free Iraq will be a major defeat in their ideology of hatred. That's why they're fighting so vociferously." —George W. Bush, first presidential debate, Coral Gables, Fla., Sept. 30, 2004

"You know, it's hard work to try to love her as best as I can, knowing full well that the decision I made caused her loved one to be in harm's way." —George W. Bush, first presidential debate, Coral Gables, Fla., Sept. 30, 2004

"I think it's very important for the American President to mean what he says. That's why I understand that the enemy could misread what I say. That's why I try to be as clearly I can." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Sept. 23, 2004

(http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/graphics/bushsmart.jpg)

"I saw a poll that said the right track/wrong track in Iraq was better than here in America. It's pretty darn strong. I mean, the people see a better future." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Sept. 23, 2004

"I'm not the expert on how the Iraqi people think, because I live in America, where it's nice and safe and secure." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Sept. 23, 2004

"It's the Afghan national army that went into Najaf and did the work there." —George W. Bush, referring to Iraqi troops during a joint press conference with Iraqi Prime Minister Ayad Allawi, Washington, D.C., Sept. 23, 2004

"The CIA laid out several scenarios and said life could be lousy, life could be OK, life could be better, and they were just guessing as to what the conditions might be like." —George W. Bush, New York City, Sept. 21, 2004

"Free societies are hopeful societies. And free societies will be allies against these hateful few who have no conscience, who kill at the whim of a hat." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Sept. 17, 2004

"Too many good docs are getting out of the business. Too many OB-GYNs aren't able to practice their love with women all across this country." —George W. Bush, Poplar Bluff, Mo., Sept. 6, 2004 (Watch video clip)

"We will make sure our troops have all that is necessary to complete their missions. That's why I went to the Congress last September and proposed fundamental — supplemental funding, which is money for armor and body parts and ammunition and fuel." —George W. Bush, Erie, Pa., Sept. 4, 2004

"Had we to do it over again, we would look at the consequences of catastrophic success, being so successful so fast that an enemy that should have surrendered or been done in escaped and lived to fight another day." —George W. Bush, telling Time magazine that he underestimated the Iraqi resistance

"They've seen me make decisions, they've seen me under trying times, they've seen me weep, they've seen me laugh, they've seen me hug. And they know who I am, and I believe they're comfortable with the fact that they know I'm not going to shift principles or shift positions based upon polls and focus groups." —George W. Bush, interview with USA Today, Aug. 27, 2004

"I hope you leave here and walk out and say, 'What did he say?'" —George W. Bush, Beaverton, Oregon, Aug. 13, 2004

"So community colleges are accessible, they're available, they're affordable, and their curriculums don't get stuck. In other words, if there's a need for a certain kind of worker, I presume your curriculums evolved over time." —George W. Bush, Niceville, Fla., Aug. 10, 2004

"Let me put it to you bluntly. In a changing world, we want more people to have control over your own life." —George W. Bush, Annandale, Va, Aug. 9, 2004

"As you know, we don't have relationships with Iran. I mean, that's — ever since the late '70s, we have no contacts with them, and we've totally sanctioned them. In other words, there's no sanctions — you can't — we're out of sanctions." —George W. Bush, Annandale, Va, Aug. 9, 2004

"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004 (Watch video clip)

"Tribal sovereignty means that; it's sovereign. I mean, you're a — you've been given sovereignty, and you're viewed as a sovereign entity. And therefore the relationship between the federal government and tribes is one between sovereign entities." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Aug. 6, 2004 (Watch video clip)

"I cut the taxes on everybody. I didn't cut them. The Congress cut them. I asked them to cut them." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Aug. 6, 2004

"I wish I wasn't the war president. Who in the heck wants to be a war president? I don't." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Aug. 6, 2004

"We stand for things." —George W. Bush, Davenport, Iowa, Aug. 5, 2004

'I don't know why you're talking about Sweden. They're the neutral one. They don't have an army.'' --George W. Bush, during an Oval Office meeting with Rep. Tom Lantos, as reported by the New York Times

"Give me a chance to be your president and America will be safer and stronger and better." —Still-President George W. Bush, Marquette, Michigan, July 13, 2004  

"I mean, if you've ever been a governor of a state, you understand the vast potential of broadband technology, you understand how hard it is to make sure that physics, for example, is taught in every classroom in the state. It's difficult to do. It's, like, cost-prohibitive." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., June 24, 2004

"And I am an optimistic person. I guess if you want to try to find something to be pessimistic about, you can find it, no matter how hard you look, you know?" —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., June 15, 2004

"I want to thank my friend, Senator Bill Frist, for joining us today. You're doing a heck of a job. You cut your teeth here, right? That's where you started practicing? That's good. He married a Texas girl, I want you to know. Karyn is with us. A West Texas girl, just like me." —George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., May 27, 2004

"I'm honored to shake the hand of a brave Iraqi citizen who had his hand cut off by Saddam Hussein." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., May 25, 2004

"Like you, I have been disgraced about what I've seen on TV that took place in prison." —George W. Bush, Parkersburg, West Virginia, May 13, 2004

"My job is to, like, think beyond the immediate." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., April 21, 2004

"They could still be hidden, like the 50 tons of mustard gas on a turkey farm." —George W. Bush, on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, Washington, D.C. , April 13, 2004

"This has been tough weeks in that country." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., April 13, 2004

"Coalition forces have encountered serious violence in some areas of Iraq. Our military commanders report that this violence is being insticated by three groups."  —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., April 13, 2004
 
"Obviously, I pray every day there's less casualty." —George W. Bush, Fort Hood, Texas, April 11, 2004

"We're still being challenged in Iraq and the reason why is a free Iraq will be a major defeat in the cause of freedom." —George W. Bush, Charlotte, N.C., April 5, 2004

"Earlier today, the Libyan government released Fathi Jahmi. She's a local government official who was imprisoned in 2002 for advocating free speech and democracy." —George W. Bush, citing Jahmi, who is a man, in a speech paying tribute to women reformers during International Women's Week, Washington, D.C., March 12, 2004
 
"The march to war hurt the economy. Laura reminded me a while ago that remember what was on the TV screens —  she calls me, 'George W.' — 'George W.' I call her, 'First Lady.' No, anyway — she said, we said, march to war on our TV screen." —George W. Bush, Bay Shore, New York, Mar. 11, 2004
"God loves you, and I love you. And you can count on both of us as a powerful message that people who wonder about their future can hear." —George W. Bush, Los Angeles, Calif., March 3, 2004

"Recession means that people's incomes, at the employer level, are going down, basically, relative to costs, people are getting laid off." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Feb. 19, 2004

"Joe, I don't do nuance." —George W. Bush to Sen. Joseph Biden, as quoted in Time, Feb. 15, 2004

(http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/graphics/bush_monkey_small.jpg)

"The march to war affected the people's confidence. It's hard to make investment. See, if you're a small business owner or a large business owner and you're thinking about investing, you've got to be optimistic when you invest. Except when you're marching to war, it's not a very optimistic thought, is it? In other words, it's the opposite of optimistic when you're thinking you're going to war." —George W. Bush, Springfield, Mo., Feb. 9, 2004

"But the true strength of America is found in the hearts and souls of people like Travis, people who are willing to love their neighbor, just like they would like to love themselves." —George W. Bush, Springfield, Mo., Feb. 9, 2004

"In my judgment, when the United States says there will be serious consequences, and if there isn't serious consequences, it creates adverse consequences." —George W. Bush, Meet the Press, Feb. 8, 2004

"There is no such thing necessarily in a dictatorial regime of iron-clad absolutely solid evidence. The evidence I had was the best possible evidence that he had a weapon." —George W. Bush, Meet the Press, Feb. 8, 2004

"The recession started upon my arrival. It could have been — some say February, some say March, some speculate maybe earlier it started — but nevertheless, it happened as we showed up here. The attacks on our country affected our economy. Corporate scandals affected the confidence of people and therefore affected the economy. My decision on Iraq, this kind of march to war, affected the economy." —George W. Bush, Meet the Press, Feb. 8, 2004

"We do know that Saddam Hussein had the intent and the capabilities to cause great harm. We know he was a great danger….What we don't know yet is what we thought and what the Iraqi Survey Group has found, and we want to look at that." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C. Feb. 2, 2004  

"My views are one that speaks to freedom." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Jan. 29, 2004

"See, one of the interesting things in the Oval Office — I love to bring people into the Oval Office — right around the corner from here — and say, this is where I office, but I want you to know the office is always bigger than the person." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Jan. 29, 2004

"More Muslims have died at the hands of killers than — I say more Muslims — a lot of Muslims have died — I don't know the exact count — at Istanbul. Look at these different places around the world where there's been tremendous death and destruction because killers kill." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Jan. 29, 2004

"Then you wake up at the high school level and find out that the illiteracy level of our children are appalling." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004

"Just remember it's the birds that's supposed to suffer, not the hunter." —George W. Bush, advising quail hunter and New Mexico Sen. Pete Domenici, Roswell, N.M., Jan. 22, 2004

"For diplomacy to be effective, words must be credible, and no one can now doubt the word of America." —George W. Bush, State of the Union Address, Jan. 20, 2004

"I want to thank the astronauts who are with us, the courageous spacial entrepreneurs who set such a wonderful example for the young of our country." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C. Jan. 14, 2004

"I was a prisoner too, but for bad reasons." —George W. Bush, to Argentine President Nestor Kirchner, on being told that all but one of the Argentine delegates to a summit meeting were imprisoned during the military dictatorship, Monterrey, Mexico, Jan. 13, 2004

(http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/graphics/bush_goofy_small.jpg)

Bushisms from 2003  (http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbushisms2003.htm)
Bushisms from 2002 (http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbushisms2002.htm)
Bushisms from 2001 (http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbushisms2001.htm)
Bushisms from 2000 (http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbushisms2000.htm)

this Should be Enough to hold the Thread for a While thanks for the spell check PREATOR DEFIANT.

Although I won't waste my time like ewm did, I will give you this:

"this shood be a nuff to hold the tread for a wile"

shood=Should
nuff=Enough
tread=Thread
wile=While

"We're not banning Canadian drugs.  We're just making sure they're safe." -George W. Bush

I think those are his exact words.  This came from the 2nd Presidential debate back in 2004.

lol sorry this was more funney, when you post huge f*** arse things like that ewm people read the first few lines and the rest are wasted as no one can be f***ed to read it.

I'm not reading a bunch of bullsh*t like that, especially when most is probably made up.

well thare will be more in the fucher i am sher we have 4 more years of Bushisms left no worys.

Yeah, that and plenty of time to make up new quotes.

How conservative of you.
listen, i take it you either dont know or care about history because conservatives tried to stop the american revolution.
They were not opposed to slavery.
LIBERALS started the European Enlightenment which got them to stop burning books and people and charges of heresy. because they believed in equal rights and treatments. I have plowed myself through a college level history course for the last year. I have seen the crap you conservatives pull off in the name of religion and false morals on Tv and in the Papers. Freedom of choice means nothing to you. Women have the right to an abortion. Homos should have the right to hapiness and marige. This country was founded on the right to liberty and the pruistuit of happiness. I am LIBERAL AND GODDAMNED PROUD OF IT. I BELIEVE IN CHOICE AND THE FREEDOM OF TRUTH.

I am sorry if this message offends you conservatives but history does not lie.

I think we can all agree that conservatives of this time and that time are differant. Think about breaking away from england when it was your home country, patriotism tearing people apart.

Of course you realise new ideas don't always work, GUESS WHAT, LIBERALS STARTED COMMUNISM! Didn't mention that did you?

Communism, because man is so corrupt by nature and greedy, it can not work. If the human race could evolve it work. The real reason communism is so horrible because the most brutal methods known were used to enforce it. Dont get me wrong, i like capitalism, i like choice of shopping and products. BUT, communism is the good of the many out whieghs the good of the few.  That is the principle of communism. isnt that sound just by it self. The principle of capitalism is ,GREED is good. Lazie fer (Let alone as adams the fore father of capitalism said.) Prove to me that i am mis informed.

PREATOR DEFIANT

whan you say stuff like: GUESS WHAT, LIBERALS STARTED COMMUNISM! Didn't mention that did you? you just look unegicated you mite wont to think about what you post be for you post it.

It can be debated, but in the end communism was responsible for over 20 million lives in russia alone. Communism made by liberals, led to millions killed in workcamps and assasinations.

Ewm, when you say stuff like 'unegicated', it makes you look like an idiot, perhaps you might want to think about what you post, before you post...

the idea behind communism was good. but PD is right bout this one. ^^

Most ideas are born out of good intentions, but that doesn't mean their always right.

yup, thats the point ^^

lets movie this to the polical deabte whare i will post a respons.