|
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: [TD]Roach on August 12, 2004, 06:17:11 AM During fights, officers and other personel have only their uniforms. without only protection against phaser fire. It would be strange that they have phasers but nothing to an officer from phaser fire.
I wouldn't be a ground troup between a phaser fire fight in the Star trek, it's just a matter of how many men you trow in a battle with phasers Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: PREATOR DEFIANT on August 12, 2004, 06:54:11 AM The only real protection against Phaser fire is energy shields, and I don't think most alpha quadrant races use or even have personal energy sheields so the only other choice is to carry alot of firepower and try not to get into a conflict.
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: [RFO]MIGHTY ROM on August 12, 2004, 03:07:54 PM actualy u thunk they could come up with a personal shield for ppl
would be so cool,u get hit 15 times and sields at 75 percent and yer still advancing lke the borg :assimilate: Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on August 12, 2004, 03:27:56 PM They have them for engineering teams (to go into dangerous areas and fix stuff), so why shouldn't they have them for security teams?
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: [TD]Roach on August 12, 2004, 04:29:14 PM well they should have shield because why would someone make a gun but not something to protect it from. it's like the first knight without his armor
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: KL0K on August 12, 2004, 07:02:03 PM well actually.. the first knight were wearin stuff to protect themselves... remember the samurai.. and i still got some things in mind like bulletproofvests... a shield would be something to think about... but i think the producers never thought of such things... or it would be too much against the TOS series, like the thing that they didnt land on planets but beamin, just bcause of the high prices for animations... i dont know...
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Lt.Cdr.White on August 12, 2004, 08:20:47 PM At least Elite Force and Elite Force II know personal shields. ;) As do the Borg. :D
Also, I think we never saw true ground forces in ST except the few Marines in Enterprise (though I haven't seen the Episodes yet... damn Sat.1! ;)). Mostly it was usual Starfleet personnel engaged in fights. Another possibility could be that usual armor wouldn't be effective against phasers and things alike. So, why waste energy for it. Another thing is perhaps that Star Trek was originally meant to be rather "pacifistic", so why should Starfleet personnel look so martial? Well, one of the many riddles Roddenberry left us... Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: [TD]Roach on August 12, 2004, 08:31:49 PM lol i am good at those questions without an aswer... lol
but you are right at one thing, Roddenberry made stratrek pascifistic or atleast the federation. Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: RFO Cairo1 on August 12, 2004, 09:42:05 PM Quote well actually.. the first knight were wearin stuff to protect themselves... remember the samurai actualy many samurai wore armor Ronin did not but this is off topic so... Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on August 12, 2004, 11:51:26 PM It's stupid, they should just have lil sheild genoraters around thier waists. It wouldn't be as noticable as a phaser in it's holster or a rifle in thier hand.
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: PREATOR DEFIANT on August 13, 2004, 02:12:16 AM You never see them with that technology tho, I never said that they did have it and i've never seen anything in the movies or show. Why didn't they shield that ground vehicle in Nemesis that Picard rode in?
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on August 13, 2004, 01:27:10 PM Starfleet engineers, they make good stuff but they gotta shield everything.
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: [RFO]MIGHTY ROM on August 13, 2004, 02:30:44 PM yes personal shielding
its verry cool pop HEY! WATCH WHERE U AIM THAT THING! *computer*shields at 97% :lol: Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: [TD]Roach on August 13, 2004, 04:02:01 PM Well i've been looking at the ds9 eposides and there was an alien race from the gamma quadrant that huts someone called tosk. and when they first arrive at the station they have some weird personal shields
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: [RFO]MIGHTY ROM on August 13, 2004, 04:12:18 PM i think i remember the toskfrom voyager, or a book or something but thAT NME RINGS A BELL -_- :hmmm:
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: KL0K on August 13, 2004, 05:48:21 PM Quote Well i've been looking at the ds9 eposides and there was an alien race from the gamma quadrant that huts someone called tosk. and when they first arrive at the station they have some weird personal shields u mean that predator race like in voyager? it had a shield too if i remember right... Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Lt.Cdr.White on August 13, 2004, 06:00:45 PM Tosk, became a good friend of O'Brien after O'Briend helped to repair his ship, the Episode is called "Captive Pursuit". The hunters wore some kind of helmets also.
Further info: http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/seri...sode/68094.html (http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/DS9/episode/68094.html) (http://www.startrek.com/imageuploads/200303/ds9-406-tosk-s-hunters-board-d/240x320.jpg) You guys know nothing... :D Here, look, it's me with the hunter ;): (http://www.startrek.com/imageuploads/200303/ds9-406-the-hunter-confers-wit/240x320.jpg) Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: [TD]Roach on August 13, 2004, 06:12:41 PM thanks changeling, that is what i meant,
But those guys look like they are from captain proton in my eyes lol or from TOS Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: PREATOR DEFIANT on August 13, 2004, 08:33:44 PM Thats why I said no major alpha quadrant powers have them...
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on August 14, 2004, 02:04:10 PM If Starfleet cares about lives so much, why don't they sheild security teams. Idiots. :mad:
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Admiral Chemix on August 14, 2004, 05:00:19 PM Star treks ground battle realism leaves a lot to be desired. Their uniforms screem "SHOOT ME" The only armor I can remember was in Star Trek 6: The undiscovered country, the security teams had a sort of protective vest and some sort of head gear but it looked rediculous, like a combination of something an umpire would wear at a ball game and an old football helemet (the leather ones) Cadarsians sort of have armor I guess, klingons do, and so do jem hadar, and borg, but the federation is left with uniforms that cry out for attension and no body armor whatsoever. Personal sheilds, that might be a good idea but I'd prefer to see armor and people not taken down in one shot from a hand phaser. It's like in star wars, the one shot rule always prevails on non important characters. If u aren't a lead roll, that armor is crap
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: ewm90 on August 14, 2004, 05:49:58 PM i think the milatry personel in enterpise are neet sorta. thay need beter wepinds some thing starfleet oferser dont have. like foltonic grands and many a ani are wepin for shooting dawn fiters.
for armer shelds whood make more sins to me than armer. klingons whare armer. starfleet whers p.j. Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on August 14, 2004, 07:08:23 PM Really, if you did not know anything about Starfleet and you beamed aboard one of their ships, you'd think they were having a pajama party! :lol:
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: PREATOR DEFIANT on August 14, 2004, 07:13:44 PM They don't have energy shields for the most part, so trying to use something you don't have JUST DOSEN'T WORK, right captain?
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on August 15, 2004, 03:10:38 PM Right. :hmmm: Get a dead Borg drone and take it's shield thingie, make more of them and put 'em on Starfleet personnel. And why doesn't Seven make some Borg shields for the crew of Voyager?
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: [TD]Roach on August 15, 2004, 05:39:53 PM well seven's shield implant is removed. but that was reactivated once by the borg signal from the crashed raven
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: ewm90 on August 15, 2004, 06:19:45 PM well star flet has sinatise and engaers i sher thay can figer out some thing.
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on August 15, 2004, 09:55:09 PM *Cough* Starfleet! *Cough* Idiots! Oh, sorry there, had a little cough. :D
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: PREATOR DEFIANT on August 15, 2004, 11:39:25 PM But the thing is they don't have personal shields...
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on August 16, 2004, 03:46:47 AM Get them! :mad:
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: ewm90 on August 16, 2004, 04:03:15 AM yes ser. lol
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: PREATOR DEFIANT on August 16, 2004, 05:33:32 AM But THEY DON'T HAVE THEM, am I getting thru?
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: -=B!G=-The Black Baron on August 16, 2004, 11:28:57 AM LOL, what DEFIANT is saying I think is that they dont have the technology to create them yet B)
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: PREATOR DEFIANT on August 16, 2004, 12:03:07 PM Yeah, I thought I made that clear 5 posts ago. You can't make fun of them feddies for something they never had or used.
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on August 16, 2004, 01:37:53 PM Well I said, GET THEM FROM THE BORG!!!!!!
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: PREATOR DEFIANT on August 16, 2004, 01:41:14 PM B U T T H E Y H A V E N 'T Y E T!!!
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on August 16, 2004, 01:42:31 PM WELL THEN ORDER SEVEN TO MAKE THEM!!!!! :mad:
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: PREATOR DEFIANT on August 16, 2004, 01:43:35 PM See your not even making sense, theres no proof the Federation or any major alpha quadrant powers have personal shields, so stop saying they do.
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: -=B!G=-The Black Baron on August 16, 2004, 01:43:43 PM She dont know how :P
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on August 16, 2004, 01:45:49 PM well, she was borg! she can remember a lot of stuff!
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: -=B!G=-The Black Baron on August 16, 2004, 01:54:11 PM Well the borg drones dont know everything, they only know what they need to know, depends on what their function is in the collective B)
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on August 16, 2004, 01:57:52 PM Drones share one mind, it is impossible for drones to not know someting that other drones know.
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: -=B!G=-The Black Baron on August 16, 2004, 01:59:58 PM Well she might not remember then or nobody asked her about that, now drop the subject THEY JUST DONT HAVE PERSONAL SHIELDS :hmmm:
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on August 16, 2004, 02:03:42 PM FINE!!!! :mad:
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Admiral Chemix on August 16, 2004, 03:58:47 PM They don't have personal shields, they don't have armor, and they run around in brightly colored cloth uniforms. Does it make any dang sense? No, it's just poor costume design and writing that follows the usual 1 hit kills unimportant characters or characters that are meant to die quick. Important characters can take dozens of shots without going down. Some are just plain phaser resistant. Why do they need armor when they have plot supersheilds
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on August 16, 2004, 09:42:19 PM Wow. :mellow: This guy said a lot in one post then we said in...a lot. Wow.
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain_Steve on August 29, 2004, 05:07:21 PM well, i just watched star trek VI last night on Spike TV and when two security guards showed up after a phaser was fired aboard the Enterprise-A, they had a flak jacket like body armor and helmets on. the security guards in the earlier movies had armor and helmets too. they never got shot at though so the armor's effectiveness is unknown. it must have done something though for them to wear it.
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: NCC1701Z on August 29, 2004, 07:27:12 PM Quote During fights, officers and other personel have only their uniforms. without only protection against phaser fire. It would be strange that they have phasers but nothing to an officer from phaser fire. They dont have armor because I wouldn't be a ground troup between a phaser fire fight in the Star trek, it's just a matter of how many men you trow in a battle with phasers Num. 1= Theres no point! a phaser set in Setting 7 (enough to kill a humanoid) could probalby blast through duranium and theres absolutely no point in armorx Num. 3= They only make the troops less agile against the enemy Num. 3= The armor costumes will probalby cost too much Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: ewm90 on August 29, 2004, 07:49:40 PM star fleet duss not use munny so cost duss not apliy
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: KL0K on August 29, 2004, 08:39:52 PM remember that there is no money in the federation needed? :rolleyes:
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on August 30, 2004, 01:59:02 AM I think he might be talkin about the cost for the show. If they had to have amor for everyone, it would've been stretching the budget.
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: NCC1701Z on August 30, 2004, 04:31:11 PM Quote Num. 3= The armor costumes will probalby cost too much I meant on the 21st Century, the costumes will cost too much, a phaser rifle costs like 400 U$ so how mcuh u think arming like 10 security officers will armors will cost? Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: startrek4747 on August 30, 2004, 06:25:57 PM Quote They dont have armor because why do you have two number 3's??? Num. 1= Theres no point! a phaser set in Setting 7 (enough to kill a humanoid) could probalby blast through duranium and theres absolutely no point in armorx Num. 3= They only make the troops less agile against the enemy Num. 3= The armor costumes will probalby cost too much Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: NCC1701Z on August 30, 2004, 08:51:29 PM My bad.. ;)
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on August 31, 2004, 02:01:58 AM Hmph. Well, it's a lot of moolah either way.
Oh, and might I suggest 5 year old math? Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: cts006 on August 31, 2004, 04:55:54 AM If you remember in the DS9 episode where ODO and Sisko went back to earth the admiral made a comment about that they stockpiled weapons and persoonal shield generators wich we never saw used in action.
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on September 03, 2004, 11:50:54 PM STAR TREK!!!! YOU'D BETTER START SHOWIN ARMOR!!!
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: PREATOR DEFIANT on September 04, 2004, 01:54:59 AM TNG screwed us over...
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: [RFO]MIGHTY ROM on September 04, 2004, 01:56:21 AM picard get hair :hmmm: :P
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: -=B!G=-The Black Baron on September 04, 2004, 10:34:22 AM Patrick Steward(Picard) was dissapointed at the fans reaaction for the last ST movie(nemesis) and he said he will never be in another ST movie again :cry:
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: PREATOR DEFIANT on September 04, 2004, 04:34:39 PM lol his loss.
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: -=B!G=-The Black Baron on September 04, 2004, 05:48:25 PM true :lol:
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on September 05, 2004, 01:33:15 PM I heard Nemesis did well in Europe. Or was that a lie?
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: -=B!G=-The Black Baron on September 05, 2004, 10:47:03 PM Well it never came in Slovenia :(
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: [RFO]MIGHTY ROM on September 05, 2004, 11:01:43 PM lol :lol: :lol: :lol: oohaha :lol:
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: ewm90 on September 05, 2004, 11:32:10 PM pore giys no star trek thare haw do you live?
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Lt.Cdr.White on September 06, 2004, 10:28:00 AM I think they have DVDs. ;)
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on September 06, 2004, 01:15:58 PM Poor people, they don't get to see it until it comes out on DVD. SUCKERS!!!!!!
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: [RFO]MIGHTY ROM on September 06, 2004, 01:19:15 PM i got lke 200 dvds in 2 black protected carry cases
estimated value?-$3000 each one for $15 at sams club Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on September 06, 2004, 02:33:33 PM You got a lot of DVDs. :lol:
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: -=B!G=-The Black Baron on September 06, 2004, 02:57:24 PM Well I have the movie about the same time u do ;) , emm there are other things than DVDs ;)
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Sferimao on September 06, 2004, 03:48:34 PM Yep, me 2. :blush:
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: -=B!G=-The Black Baron on September 06, 2004, 04:21:18 PM Well these "secret CDs" are available all over internet ;) :D
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on September 06, 2004, 05:14:04 PM Oh...pirating. :pirate:
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: -=B!G=-The Black Baron on September 06, 2004, 08:08:26 PM u said it not me :lol: :P
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on September 06, 2004, 09:25:36 PM Riiiiiiiight. ;)
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: [RFO]MIGHTY ROM on September 06, 2004, 11:27:54 PM piracy has bad rez and stuff
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: OMEGA on September 06, 2004, 11:52:10 PM Quite someone i'll call Mr O :ph34r: borrowed Finding Nemo & King Arther of a m8 pirated with terrible picture quality and the sound quality was a joke, best avoided.
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on September 07, 2004, 12:50:59 AM Yep, piracy is BAD.
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: KL0K on September 07, 2004, 12:23:49 PM yea, piracy is bad... and robin hood too... think about it - its ironic ;)
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: -=B!G=-The Black Baron on September 07, 2004, 02:59:50 PM Steal from the rich and give to the poor :D
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: Captain Defiant on September 09, 2004, 02:05:56 AM Robin Hood helped people though. For a good reason.
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: KL0K on September 09, 2004, 02:36:22 AM try to explain "helping for a good reason" or "good reason" aswell.. when ppl dont got enough money, i think its a good reason ;)... so i think crackin is a "kind of help" :lol:
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: -=B!G=-The Black Baron on September 09, 2004, 02:36:14 PM lol, a nice way to make somthing thats illegal legal :D
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: PREATOR DEFIANT on September 09, 2004, 09:09:34 PM What does body armor have to do with robin hood? :D
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: KL0K on September 09, 2004, 11:04:15 PM get shot by his arrows without heavy armor and u know why :lol:
Title: Soldiers Without Armor? Post by: PREATOR DEFIANT on September 10, 2004, 01:30:21 AM So true.
Powered by SMF 1.1.3 |
SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com |