Star Trek Armada II: Fleet Operations

hey do any of u know warp theory or at least advanced algebra? my science projects on warp theory and i need some help with the algebra and stuff
*sings*help, i need some body, help, not just any body, ooo, ooo, ooo*sings*

get a copy of the star fleet tecnical manul

where is it? a site or anything?
 :huh:  

its a book i have.  

   not sher of a site but a good book that will realy help you is the fisics of star trek by stein hockings.

thnks ill try :sweatdrop:  

last i heard, warp wasnt possible.. :P

might be only a guess or at least a little hint: www.ditl.org there are some articel's around regarding warp and lightspeed. Otherwise try Google or ask someone who studies. Normally you find the oddest and strangest things on Servers held by a university. (Personal experience)

I FEEL SO HELPED!
ANYONE KNOW HOW TO HAK INTO REPORT CADS STUFF?

Another nice book is by Rick Sternbach and Mike Okuda:

Technical Manual to the USS Enterprise NCC-1701D.

Perhaps you can find that one somewhere.

thnks all

Warp: how it works:
A crash course by [RFO]startrek47
Well....to reach warp 1, 10, 20, 30... you need infinite power. So the ship goes into subspace(ever wondered about that commbadge design???), and you can apply less power for the same speed!!! You still need to send compressed streams of Deuterium(Hydrogen 2) and anti-deuterium, as well as a dilithium crystal. the Deuterium and anti-deuterium react in the dilithium crystal after being constricted on 6 decks of a starship on either side by magnetic constrictors, and the crystal focuses the power to the nacelles in a focused plasma stream via a power transfer conduit to port and starboard. Then the plasma is injected into warp field coils(made of verterium cortenide, and Tungsten-cobalt-magnesium). you go to warp.
THE END!!!
for more information, see www.ditl.org or the Star Trek: the Next Generation Technical Manual
PS: Quantum singularities are better :)  ;)  :) .

thats why im rom, only they can never be shut down ;)  

in realaty anit-mater is real thay made some in a atam smasher a litale wile a god it lastes less than a sec but if can be used it whood push a ship at 3/4 the speed of worp

thats a fission reaction!

well actually, anti matter is the oppsite of matter. And matter is everything so if anit matter reacts with amtter, it should react immediately like a BIG explosion. even 1 drop is good enough to destroy hiroshima over and over again

so u dont need brrels an barrels of it to power ships? :sweatdrop:  

On the post before:

Federation ships carry loads of deuterium, as it is also used for the fusion reactors powering some subsystems, emergency power and of course, the impulse propulsion system.

Comparing to this huge amount, there is rather few antimatter onboard. It is stored in containers that are about 2m in either direction (function explained later). However, it's enough that is carried. It is used to load torpedoes as well and enough for several years of independent operation.

And remember: To generate a warp field of 1000 mCochrane (equalling Warp 1), you need much power. And much, much more to reach Warp 9 - which is on the other side much more cost efficient thant Warp 9.2, as every Warp factor is a velocity at which a energy 'hole' is reached. Warp speeds between whole numbers need much more energy, that's why reaching Warp 1 needs more energy than holding it.

This table shoes the energy levels:

http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/treknology/warptable.gif (http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/treknology/warptable.gif)


On Antimatter:

One theory is that only the exact counterpart of an particle can destroy it (I don't know if it applies in reality, but it's true that a M/AM reaction was done some time ago. However, it were only a few protons and anti-protons if I'm right (you could call it hydrogen and antihydrogen).

However, the danger is why (on ST ships) AM is stored in special containers where it is held in a magnetical field so it can't touch anything.

And on Galaxy glass ships, there are a few more magnetic constriction segments on the way from the Deuterium injector than from the antimatter injector to the core. So it's 18 meters up and 12 meters down (although the deck count stated in the Technical Manual says deck 30 for the upper injector, 36 for the core and 43 for the lower injector, the meter figures are from the same book and all diagrams show the different count of constriction segments clearly).



I found something for your project:

http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/warp.htm (http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/warp.htm)

Lots to read but definately worth it (I believe ;)).

Id post about the warp thing but i did this before on anothe thread and also in the transwarp one, but for report card how do you feel about beeing expelled?

Damn, i didn't saw this interesting topic before.  :blush:

But here is one public lecture of Stephen Hawking about space and time warps.

Ill download it if you awnser this.

Is it relevant to FTL Travel?

Yep it is. It describes (readable to anyone) possible theoretical problems with curving space-time.  And that is what star trek warp is doing, similiar to wormholes.

I dunno, warp in my opinion creates a bubble that changes the laws of physics so that FTL travel is posible withlout infinite energy.

Star Trek is among the science fiction with the most eloborated science and technology. Yet, the well-known warp drive is rather a visualization of FTL travel for TV than a real physical or even technological concept.

So, it doesn't describe how to build ship with warp propulsion. But your question was "Is it relevant to FTL Travel?".  The answer is still yes. Read it so you can answer your question for yourself.

Okay ill read it later.